Create a report your assessment of the current project status

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
6th Edition
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
ChapterC: Cases
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 5.3SD: Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling...
icon
Related questions
Question
Create a report your assessment of the current project status
In 1999, the XY Department of the Federal Government reviewed its Year 2000 Date Turnover
Computer Risks and found that its outdated computer systems for managing public clients needed
replacing. A business case was prepared for funding the replacement while at the same time
implementing some improvements. The total budget requested was $2.3 million.
In view of a shortage of funds around at the time, government did not approve this amount. Only
$1.5 million was authorized. However, the XY Department accepted this amount after they decided
that they could maybe do the work for around the $1.5 m.
Accordingly, a project was scoped and planned, with specific milestones for implementing the
hardware and, subsequently the software, across 87 sites within its jurisdiction. A final completion
date of 30th June 2001 was projected. The original business case had loosely identified some risks
to the project that were also included in the project plan. A project steering committee was
established, with the department chief (CEO) as the sponsor, and representation by influential
managers with differing outcome needs to suit their particular work environment. The project
commenced in July 1999.
In view of the shortfall on its original budget request, the committee decided not to employ a project
manager. Instead it assigned this responsibility to its Finance Manager, who would undertake the
work along with his normal duties.
A Company, called "Good Programs" was contracted to supply the software and assist in the
implementation. This company recognized the marketing opportunities of this project, as the XY
Department was its biggest client in the region. As a result, they offered, free of charge, many more
features that were not in the original scope, provided the department allowed them to be, in essence
a research and development (R&D) site. This would assist Good Programs to more readily sell their
products elsewhere around the world, while providing the XY Department with additional functionality
and benefits.
Initially, the steering committee met regularly, but as new versions of the resulting software were
being implemented regularly, meetings became less frequent and Good Programs were left to do
more and more of the day to day management of the new version implementations.
These new versions were developed after consultation with the various individual managers to
accommodate requested new features with little consultation amongst all of the managers. All the XY
Department and steering committee had to do was to identify problems with the software and to
make the system testers available for new versions. However, the effect was an unanticipated
overhead for the department.
Sometime after the original project was scoped and commenced, both the original CEO and finance
manager had been moved out of the department and new officers have been appointed.
Transcribed Image Text:In 1999, the XY Department of the Federal Government reviewed its Year 2000 Date Turnover Computer Risks and found that its outdated computer systems for managing public clients needed replacing. A business case was prepared for funding the replacement while at the same time implementing some improvements. The total budget requested was $2.3 million. In view of a shortage of funds around at the time, government did not approve this amount. Only $1.5 million was authorized. However, the XY Department accepted this amount after they decided that they could maybe do the work for around the $1.5 m. Accordingly, a project was scoped and planned, with specific milestones for implementing the hardware and, subsequently the software, across 87 sites within its jurisdiction. A final completion date of 30th June 2001 was projected. The original business case had loosely identified some risks to the project that were also included in the project plan. A project steering committee was established, with the department chief (CEO) as the sponsor, and representation by influential managers with differing outcome needs to suit their particular work environment. The project commenced in July 1999. In view of the shortfall on its original budget request, the committee decided not to employ a project manager. Instead it assigned this responsibility to its Finance Manager, who would undertake the work along with his normal duties. A Company, called "Good Programs" was contracted to supply the software and assist in the implementation. This company recognized the marketing opportunities of this project, as the XY Department was its biggest client in the region. As a result, they offered, free of charge, many more features that were not in the original scope, provided the department allowed them to be, in essence a research and development (R&D) site. This would assist Good Programs to more readily sell their products elsewhere around the world, while providing the XY Department with additional functionality and benefits. Initially, the steering committee met regularly, but as new versions of the resulting software were being implemented regularly, meetings became less frequent and Good Programs were left to do more and more of the day to day management of the new version implementations. These new versions were developed after consultation with the various individual managers to accommodate requested new features with little consultation amongst all of the managers. All the XY Department and steering committee had to do was to identify problems with the software and to make the system testers available for new versions. However, the effect was an unanticipated overhead for the department. Sometime after the original project was scoped and commenced, both the original CEO and finance manager had been moved out of the department and new officers have been appointed.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning