(d) If the risk-free rate is higher, what would you expect the optimal risky portfolio to differ from the current one (for 3% risk-free rate) in terms of expected return and standard deviation?

Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:NICHOLSON
Chapter7: Uncertainty
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 7.10P
icon
Related questions
Question

I need help with question d

Q2 (Essential to cover – a, b, c, d)
Suppose that the risk-free rate is 3% and that the corresponding optimal risky portfolio has an
expected return of 15% and a standard deviation of 20%. Consider an investor with preferences
represented by the utility function U = E(r) – 0.5A0°, where A = 2.
(a) What fraction of her wealth should she invest in the risky portfolio?
(b) Should she invest more or less fraction of her wealth in the optimal risky portfolio if she is
more risk-averse? Why?
(c) Should she invest more or less fraction of her wealth in the optimal risky portfolio if the
optimal risky portfolio offers a higher expected return (but the same standard deviation)? Why?
(d) If the risk-free rate is higher, what would you expect the optimal risky portfolio to differ from
the current one (for 3% risk-free rate) in terms of expected return and standard deviation?
(e) Now suppose that the investor faces a higher risk-free rate when borrowing (because you are
facing more borrowing constraints than the government, or people won't allow you to borrow at
the same rate as the government). Specifically, the investor may lend at a risk-free rate of 3% but
has to borrow at a risk-free rate of 5%. Assume for simplicity that the optimal risky portfolio is
the same for either 3% risk-free rate or 5% risk-free rate, i.e., with an expected return of 15% and
a standard deviation of 20% (this should not be the case in reality, as you will find out in
question (d)). What fraction of her wealth should the investor now put in the risky portfolio?
Hint: The risk-free rate of 3% will imply a fraction yl of wealth invested in the optimal risky
portfolio. The risk-free rate of 5% will imply another fraction y2 of wealth invested in the
optimal risky portfolio. However, 3% is only available for the investor to lend (so she cannot
borrow to invest more than her wealth to invest in the optimal risky portfolio). If she wants to
borrow to invest more than her wealth to invest in the optimal risky portfolio, she will have to go
with 5% risk-free rate (but she won't be able to lend at 5% rate).
The key here is: you would need to understand what weights in the optimal risky portfolio mean
she will lend, and what weights mean she will borrow.
(f) What is the expected return and standard deviation of the portfolio that you found in (e)?
Transcribed Image Text:Q2 (Essential to cover – a, b, c, d) Suppose that the risk-free rate is 3% and that the corresponding optimal risky portfolio has an expected return of 15% and a standard deviation of 20%. Consider an investor with preferences represented by the utility function U = E(r) – 0.5A0°, where A = 2. (a) What fraction of her wealth should she invest in the risky portfolio? (b) Should she invest more or less fraction of her wealth in the optimal risky portfolio if she is more risk-averse? Why? (c) Should she invest more or less fraction of her wealth in the optimal risky portfolio if the optimal risky portfolio offers a higher expected return (but the same standard deviation)? Why? (d) If the risk-free rate is higher, what would you expect the optimal risky portfolio to differ from the current one (for 3% risk-free rate) in terms of expected return and standard deviation? (e) Now suppose that the investor faces a higher risk-free rate when borrowing (because you are facing more borrowing constraints than the government, or people won't allow you to borrow at the same rate as the government). Specifically, the investor may lend at a risk-free rate of 3% but has to borrow at a risk-free rate of 5%. Assume for simplicity that the optimal risky portfolio is the same for either 3% risk-free rate or 5% risk-free rate, i.e., with an expected return of 15% and a standard deviation of 20% (this should not be the case in reality, as you will find out in question (d)). What fraction of her wealth should the investor now put in the risky portfolio? Hint: The risk-free rate of 3% will imply a fraction yl of wealth invested in the optimal risky portfolio. The risk-free rate of 5% will imply another fraction y2 of wealth invested in the optimal risky portfolio. However, 3% is only available for the investor to lend (so she cannot borrow to invest more than her wealth to invest in the optimal risky portfolio). If she wants to borrow to invest more than her wealth to invest in the optimal risky portfolio, she will have to go with 5% risk-free rate (but she won't be able to lend at 5% rate). The key here is: you would need to understand what weights in the optimal risky portfolio mean she will lend, and what weights mean she will borrow. (f) What is the expected return and standard deviation of the portfolio that you found in (e)?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Asymmetric Information
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning