Question 11 Correlation ResultsFifty-four wild bears were anesthetized, and then their weights and chest sizes were measured and listed in a data set. Results are shown in the accompanying display. Isthere sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it Correlation coeff, r: 0.978558easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight? Use a significance level of α = 0.05.Critical r:+0.268085P-value (two tailed): 0.000r= (Round to three decimal places as needed.)Identify the critical value(s).(Round to three decimal places as needed.)O A. There is one critical value at r=OB. There are two critical values at r= +Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? Choose the correct answer below and, if necessary, fill in the answer boxwithin your choice.(Round to three decimal places as needed.)OA. Yes, because the absolute value of the test statisticOB. No, because the absolute value of the test statisticOC. Yes, because the test statisticexceeds the critical value.exceeds the critical valuefalls between the critical values.OD. No, because the test statisticfalls between the critical values.OE. The answer cannot be determined from the given information.Next Fifty-four wild bears were anesthetized, and then their weights and chest sizes were measured and listed in a data set. Results are shown in the accompanying display. Isthere sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it Correlation coeff, r: 0.978558Correlation Resultseasier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight? Use a significance level of a = 0.05.Critical r:+0.2680855P-value (two tailed): 0.000(Round to three decimal places as needed.)OA. Yes, because the absolute value of the test statisticAOB. No, because the absolute value of the test statisticOC. Yes, because the test statisticexceeds the critical value.exceeds the critical valuefalls between the critical values.OD. No, because the test statisticfalls between the critical values.O E. The answer cannot be determined from the given information.When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight?OA. Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than a weight because measuring weight would require lifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could be used to predict weight because there is a linearcorrelation between the two.OB. No, it is easier to measure weight than chest size because the chest is not a flat surface.OC. Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than a weight because measuring weight would require lifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could not be used to predict weight because there is toomuch variance in the weight of the bears.OD. Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than a weight because measuring weight would require lifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could not be used to predict weight because there is not alinear correlation between the twoNext

Question

Accepted Answer

Given,
The correlation coefficient (r) =0.978558
significance level (α) = 0.05   
t critical…

ere sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a lir sier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appea