es Truckers, Inc. acquired a heavy road transporter on January 1, 2012 at a cost of P10 million. The estimated useful life is 10 years. On January 1, 2018, the power train requires replacement, as further maintenance is uneconomical due to the off-road time required. The remainder of the vehicle is perfectly roadworthy and is expected to last for the next four years. The cost of the new power train is P4.5 million. 20. Assuming that the original cost of the power train is P3 million, the total depreciation expense in 2018 is_________. 21.Assuming that the original cost of the power train is not separately identifiable and the appropriate discount rate is 5% (the present value of 1 at 5% for 6 years is 0.7462), the total depreciation expense in 2018 is ?

es Truckers, Inc. acquired a heavy road transporter on January 1, 2012 at a cost of P10 million. The estimated useful life is 10 years. On January 1, 2018, the power train requires replacement, as further maintenance is uneconomical due to the off-road time required. The remainder of the vehicle is perfectly roadworthy and is expected to last for the next four years. The cost of the new power train is P4.5 million. 20. Assuming that the original cost of the power train is P3 million, the total depreciation expense in 2018 is_________. 21.Assuming that the original cost of the power train is not separately identifiable and the appropriate discount rate is 5% (the present value of 1 at 5% for 6 years is 0.7462), the total depreciation expense in 2018 is ?

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter9: Capital Budgeting And Cash Flow Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

13. Ebasan Company acquired a heavy road transporter on January 1, 2015 at a cost of P10,000,000. The estimated useful life is 10 years. On January 1, 2021, the power train requires replacement, as further maintenance is uneconomical due to the off-road time required. The remainder of the vehicle is perfectly roadworthy and is expected to last for the next four years. The cost of the new power train is P4,500,000. Assuming that the original cost of the power train is P3,000,000, the total depreciation expense in 2021 is A. 2,200,000 B. 1,825,000 C. 1,150,000 D. 1,450,000 14. Assuming that the original cost of the power train is not separately identifiable and the appropriate discount rate is 5%, the total depreciation expense in 2021 is A. 1,000,000 B. 2,500,000 C. 2,934,362 D. 1,789,210
Riles Truckers, Inc. acquired a heavy road transporter on January 1, 2014 at a cost of P10 million. The estimated useful life is 10 years. On January 1, 2020, the power train requires replacement, as further maintenance is uneconomical due to the off-road time required. The remainder of the vehicle is perfectly roadworthy and is expected to last for the next four years. The cost of the new power train is P4.5 million. Assuming that the original cost of the power train is P3 million, the total depreciation expense in 2020 is a. P2,200,000 b. P1,150,000 c. P1,825,000 d. P1,450,000
Riles Truckers, Inc. acquired a heavy road transporter on January 1, 2014 at a cost of P10 million. The estimated useful life is 10 years. On January 1, 2020, the power train requires replacement, as further maintenance is uneconomical due to the off-road time required. The remainder of the vehicle is perfectly roadworthy and is expected to last for the next four years. The cost of the new power train is P4.5 million. 1. Assuming that the original cost of the power train is P3 million, the total depreciation expense in 2020 is 2. Assuming that the original cost of the power train is not separately identifiable and the appropriate discount rate is 5% (the present value of 1 at 5% for 6 years is 0.7462), the total depreciation expense in 2020 is ?
Commercial Hydronics is considering replacing one of its larger control devices. A new unit sells for $32,000 (delivered). An additional $4,000 will be needed to install the device. The new device has an estimated 18-year service life. The estimated salvage value at the end of 18 years will be $2,000. The new control device will be depreciated as a 7-year MACRS asset. The existing control device (original cost = $15,000) has been in use for 9 years, and it has been fully depreciated (that is, its book value equals zero). Its scrap value is estimated to be $2,500. The existing device could be used indefinitely, assuming the firm is willing to pay for its very high maintenance costs. The firm's marginal tax rate is 40 percent. The new control device requires lower maintenance costs and frees up personnel who normally would have to monitor the system. Estimated annual cash savings from the new device will be $5,000. The firm's cost of capital is 10 percent. What is the NPV?
Ebasan Company acquired a heavy road transporter on January 1, 2015 at a cost of P10,000,000. The estimated useful life is 10 years. On lanuary 1, 2021, the power train requires replacement, as further maintenance is uneconomical due to the off-road time required. The remainder of the vehicle is perfectly roadworthy and is expected to last for the next four years. The cost of the new power train is P4,500,000. Assuming that the original cast of the power train ts not separately identifiable and the appropriate discount rate is 5%, the total depreciation expense in 2021 is
Commercial Hydronics is considering replacing one of its larger control devices. A new unit sells for $27,000 (delivered). An additional $4,000 will be needed to install the device. The new device has an estimated 17-year service life. The estimated salvage value at the end of 17 years will be $2,000. The new control device will be depreciated as a 7-year MACRS asset. The existing control device (original cost = $20,000) has been in use for 11 years, and it has been fully depreciated (that is, its book value equals zero). Its scrap value is estimated to be $2,000. The existing device could be used indefinitely, assuming the firm is willing to pay for its very high maintenance costs. The firm's marginal tax rate is 40 percent. The new control device requires lower maintenance costs and frees up personnel who normally would have to monitor the system. Estimated annual cash savings from the new device will be $10,000. The firm's cost of capital is 12 percent.Evaluate the relative merits…
Commercial Hydronics is considering replacing one of its larger control devices. A new unit sells for $29,000 (delivered). An additional $3,000 will be needed to install the device. The new device has an estimated 20-‐year service life. The estimated salvage value at the end of 20 years will be $2,000. The new control device will be depreciated as a 7-‐year MACRS asset. The existing control device (original cost = $15,000) has been in use for 12 years, and it has been fully depreciated (that is, its book value equals zero). Its scrap value is estimated to be $1,000. The existing device could be used indefinitely, assuming the firm is willing to pay for its very high maintenance costs. The firm’s marginal tax rate is 40 percent. The newcontrol device requires lower maintenance costs and frees up personnel who normally would have to monitor the system. Estimated annual cash savings from the new device will be $9,000. The firm’scost of capital is 12 percent. Evaluate the relative merits…
A conveyor system was purchased three years ago for $60,000 with an expected useful life of 10 years and no expected salvage value. Due to a change in product configuration, the conveyor system must be upgraded at a cost of $20,000. Maintenance on this system is approximately $4000 per year and the current system has a market value of $2000. Alternatively, the current system can be replaced with new equipment costing $65,000, with operating costs of $1,000 per year and an expected salvage of $10,000 after 7 years. Determine whether the company should keep or replace the defender now at an MARR of 15% per year. The current system is the Defender and the new system is the Challenger. What is the annual worth of the challenger?
A company is considering replacing an old machine. The trade-in value of the old machine is currently $30,000. The unit costs $250,000 annually to operate and maintain. A new unit can be purchased for $700,000 and will have annual O&M costs of $120,000. If the old unit is retained it will have no salvage value at the end of its remaining life of 10 years. The new unit, if purchased, will have a salvage value $50,000 in 10 years. Find a) the equivalent uniform annual cost (EUAC) for keeping the old machine, and b) the EUAC for replacing the old machine with the new machine. Should the old machine be replaced based on your calculations? The MARR is 10%. Use the cash flow approach (insider's viewpoint approach)
The Container Corporation of America is considering replacing an automatic painting machine purchased 9 years ago for $700,000. It has a market value today of $40,000. The unit costs $350,000 annually to operate and maintain. A new unit can be purchased for $800,000 and will have annual O&M costs of $120,000. If the old unit is retained, it will have no salvage value at the end of its remaining life of 10 years. The new unit, if purchased, will have a salvage value of $100,000 in 10 years. Using an EUAC measure and a MARR of 20% should the automatic painting machine be replaced if the old automatic painting machine is taken as a trade-in for its market value of $40,000? Solve, a. Use the cash flow approach (insider’s viewpoint approach). b. Use the opportunity cost approach (outsider’s view point approach).
Russell Industries is considering replacing a fully depreciated machine that has a remaining useful life of 10 years with a newer, more sophisticated machine. The new machine will cost $194,000 and will require $29,400 in installation costs. It will be depreciated under MACRS using a 5-year recovery period Percentage by recovery year* Recovery year 3 years 5 years 7 years 10 years 1 33% 20% 14% 10% 2 45% 32% 25% 18% 3 15% 19% 18% 14% 4 7% 12% 12% 12% 5 12% 9% 9% 6 5% 9% 8% 7 9% 7% 8 4% 6% 9 6% 10 6% 11 4% Totals 100% 100% 100% 100% A $30,000 increase in net working capital will be required to support the new machine. The firm's managers plan to evaluate the potential replacement over a…
Metlock Inc. wants to replace its current equipment with new high-tech equipment. The existing equipment was purchased 5 years ago at a cost of $121,000. At that time, the equipment had an expected life of 10 years, with no expected salvage value. The equipment is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. Currently, the market value of the old equipment is $43.500. The new equipment can be bought for $173,440, including installation. Over its 10-year life, it will reduce operating expenses from $190,600 to $148,700 for the first six years, and from $202,600 to $191,800 for the last four years. Net working capital requirements will also increase by $20,900 at the time of replacement. It is estimated that the company can sell the new equipment for $24,100 at the end of its life. Since the new equipment's cash flows are relatively certain, the project's cost of capital is set at 10%, compared with 15% for an average-risk project. The firm's maximum acceptable payback period is 5 years.…