Koh, a California resident, won a judgment in California of $240,000 against Inno-Pacific Holdings, Ltd., a Singapore company, but Inno-Pacific did not pay the judgment. Koh discovered that the company had an interest in land in Washington State, so he filed suit in Washington to seize the property to satisfy his judgment. The trial court in Washington dismissed the suit, because it lacked personal jurisdiction over Inno-Pacific. Koh appealed. On what basis could the Washington court have jurisdiction?

icon
Related questions
Question
Koh, a California resident, won a judgment in California of $240,000 against Inno-Pacific Holdings, Ltd., a
Singapore company, but Inno-Pacific did not pay the judgment. Koh discovered that the company had
an interest in land in Washington State, so he filed suit in Washington to seize the property to satisfy his
judgment. The trial court in Washington dismissed the suit, because it lacked personal jurisdiction over
Inno-Pacific. Koh appealed. On what basis could the Washington court have jurisdiction?
Transcribed Image Text:Koh, a California resident, won a judgment in California of $240,000 against Inno-Pacific Holdings, Ltd., a Singapore company, but Inno-Pacific did not pay the judgment. Koh discovered that the company had an interest in land in Washington State, so he filed suit in Washington to seize the property to satisfy his judgment. The trial court in Washington dismissed the suit, because it lacked personal jurisdiction over Inno-Pacific. Koh appealed. On what basis could the Washington court have jurisdiction?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer