M sells goods to a rogue, R. R obtained the title of the goods despites his deceit intention. R appears to resell the goods to N, who is the innocent purchaser, and N obtained the title of the goods. Is the contract void or voidable? Can M recover the goods from N? Please state your reasons.
M sells goods to a rogue, R. R obtained the title of the goods despites his deceit intention. R appears to resell the goods to N, who is the innocent purchaser, and N obtained the title of the goods. Is the contract void or voidable? Can M recover the goods from N? Please state your reasons.
Related questions
Question
1. M sells goods to a rogue, R. R obtained the title of the goods despites his deceit intention. R appears to resell the goods to N, who is the innocent purchaser, and N obtained the title of the goods.
Is the contract void or voidable? Can M recover the goods from N? Please state your reasons.
2. Peter, who is a minor, hires a riding horse and promises to handle the animal with care, as the term of the contract stipulates. In his excitement, Peter injures the horse by riding it too hard. Queen, who is the owner of the horse, sues Peter for the breach of contract and tort of negligence.
Does the action of Queen proper?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
