Many everyday objects such as amusement park rides, cars, elevators, and ovens, etc. that you might not normally associated with a computer or information system, in fact, are today. There are obvious benefits, but are there risks as well? For instance, would you feel more or less comfortable riding on a roller coaster that was computer controlled? Or would you feel safe enough riding a Tesla using its auto-drive feature? Do the benefits of computerizing an increasing number of everyday objects outweigh the potential risks? Why or why not?

Many everyday objects such as amusement park rides, cars, elevators, and ovens, etc. that you might not normally associated with a computer or information system, in fact, are today. There are obvious benefits, but are there risks as well? For instance, would you feel more or less comfortable riding on a roller coaster that was computer controlled? Or would you feel safe enough riding a Tesla using its auto-drive feature? Do the benefits of computerizing an increasing number of everyday objects outweigh the potential risks? Why or why not?

Principles of Information Systems (MindTap Course List)

12th Edition

ISBN:9781285867168

Author:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds

Publisher:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds

Chapter4: Software: Systems And Application Software

Section4.7: Ethical & Societal Issues: Digital Software Systems May Improve Nuclear Power Plant Safety

Problem 2CTQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Many everyday objects such as amusement park rides, cars, elevators, and ovens, etc. that you might not normally associated with a computer or information system, in fact, are today. There are obvious benefits, but are there risks as well? For instance, would you feel more or less comfortable riding on a roller coaster that was computer controlled? Or would you feel safe enough riding a Tesla using its auto-drive feature? Do the benefits of computerizing an increasing number of everyday objects outweigh the potential risks? Why or why not?
Many ordinary objects (such as amusement park rides, cars, elevators, and ovens) are now computerized. Clearly, there are benefits, but are there risks? For example, would you want to ride a computer-controlled roller coaster? Do the benefits of computerizing more ordinary goods outweigh the risks? So, why?
Many everyday objects (such as amusement park rides, autos, elevators, and ovens) that you would not typically associate with a computer or information system are, in fact, computers or information systems in today's society. While there are some benefits, are there also hazards involved in this situation? For example, would you feel more or less comfortable if you were on a roller coaster that was computer-controlled? What are the dangers and benefits of growing the computerization of everyday activities? Do the benefits exceed the hazards? What are your arguments in favor of or against it?
Numerous ordinary devices, such as amusement park attractions, automobiles, elevators, and ovens, among others, are now connected to a computer or information system. While there are certain advantages, are there also risks? For instance, would you feel more or less secure riding a computer-controlled roller coaster? Or would you feel secure enough traveling in a Tesla equipped with auto-drive? Do the advantages of expanding the computerization of common things outweigh the risks? What are your reasons for or against?
There are many commonplace items (such as amusement park rides, vehicles, elevators, and ovens) that are, in reality, computers or information systems nowadays. You would not ordinarily link them with a computer or information system. It is abundantly clear that there are advantages, but what about potential drawbacks? For illustration's sake, if you were to ride a roller coaster that was computer controlled, would you feel more or less comfortable doing so? The computerization of an increasing number of ordinary things raises the question of whether the possible advantages exceed the potential drawbacks. If not, then why not?
The usage of computers and information systems is now prevalent in many common items such as amusement park rides, automobiles, elevators, and ovens, among other things, that you would not usually connect with computers or information systems. There are certain advantages, but are there any dangers as well? If, for example, you were riding a roller coaster that was computer controlled, would you feel more or less at ease? Alternatively, would you feel secure enough traveling in a Tesla with the auto-drive function turned on? What are the advantages and disadvantages of computerizing a growing number of daily objects? Do the potential benefits outweigh the risks? What is the reason for this or why is it not?
A wide variety of everyday objects (including attractions at amusement parks, autos, elevators, and ovens) are really computers or information systems these days. The typical person would not connect them to a computer or database. The benefits are obvious, but are there any downsides to consider? As an example, if you rode a computer-controlled roller coaster, how confident would you be in its safety? As more and more mundane tasks are automated by computers, we have to ask whether the benefits are worth the cons. If so, then explain why.
Nowadays, a lot of everyday objects, like roller coasters, cars, elevators, and ovens, are really computers or information systems. Normally, you wouldn't connect them to a computer or information system. There are benefits without a doubt, but what about possible disadvantages? Do you think you would feel more or less at ease riding a computer-controlled roller coaster, just as an example? The issue of whether potential benefits outweigh potential downsides arises when more and more commonplace tasks are computerized. In that case, why not?
Someone who examines and evaluates software on computers is known as a software tester. You are going to need to check your calculator when it is time for you to take the test. If you had to choose one kind of exam over another, which would it be and why? You may give it a go by thinking of five distinct possible outcomes and making a list of them.
Computers are programmed to play chess, scrabble, and even crossword puzzles (American Scientist, September/October 1999). They are getting better and better; in fact, a computer beat the world’s number-one chess grand master, Garry Kasparov. Do you agree that such computer systems exhibit intelligence? Why or why not?
Some professions are too risky, insulting, or mundane for humans, therefore robots may be programmed to undertake them instead. If you believe a robot may be more efficient than a person in doing a certain work, please provide an example. Is there any particular reason why you think people would rather trust a machine with this responsibility rather than another human being?
Do subcultures or countercultures in the areas of computers have made just as much of an impact on the advancement of technology as big business has? Where might we be had small fringe groups not had the desire to push the boundaries of what is considered normal or right?