Maria has two routes, E and W, she can take when commuting to work. Both routes go through a railroad crossing, and sometimes she needs to stop at the crossing to allow trains to pass. She claims that the proportion of times she needs to stop when taking route E is different from the proportion of times she needs to stop when taking route W. She conducted the following hypothesis test at the significance level of α=0.10. H0:pE=pWHa:pE≠pW In the hypotheses, pE represents the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing when using route E, and pWrepresents the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing when using route W. All conditions for inference were met, and the resulting p-value was 0.37. Which of the following is the correct decision for the test? The p-value is less than α, and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes. Answer A: The p -value is less than alpha , and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes. A The p-value is greater than α, and the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is the same for the different routes. Answer B: The p -value is greater than alpha , and the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is the same for the different routes. B The p-value is greater than α, and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is not convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes. Answer C: The p -value is greater than alpha , and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is not convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes. C The p-value is greater than α, and the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is not convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes. Answer D: The p -value is greater than alpha , and the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is not convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes. D The p-value is greater than α, and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes.

Maria has two routes, E and W, she can take when commuting to work. Both routes go through a railroad crossing, and sometimes she needs to stop at the crossing to allow trains to pass. She claims that the proportion of times she needs to stop when taking route E is different from the proportion of times she needs to stop when taking route W. She conducted the following hypothesis test at the significance level of α=0.10. H0:pE=pWHa:pE≠pW In the hypotheses, pE represents the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing when using route E, and pWrepresents the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing when using route W. All conditions for inference were met, and the resulting p-value was 0.37. Which of the following is the correct decision for the test? The p-value is less than α, and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes. Answer A: The p -value is less than alpha , and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes. A The p-value is greater than α, and the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is the same for the different routes. Answer B: The p -value is greater than alpha , and the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is the same for the different routes. B The p-value is greater than α, and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is not convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes. Answer C: The p -value is greater than alpha , and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is not convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes. C The p-value is greater than α, and the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is not convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes. Answer D: The p -value is greater than alpha , and the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is not convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes. D The p-value is greater than α, and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes.

Name: Maria has two routes, E and W, she can take when commuting to work. Bo
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:00.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: Maria has two routes, E and W, she can take when commuting to work. Both routes go through a railroad crossing, and sometimes she needs to stop at the crossing to allow trains to pass. She claims that the proportion of times she needs to stop when ta

Calculus For The Life Sciences

2nd Edition

ISBN:9780321964038

Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.

Publisher:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.

Chapter1: Functions

Section1.2: The Least Square Line

Problem 4E

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Concept explainers

Topic Video

Question

H0:pE=pWHa:pE≠pW

In the hypotheses, pE represents the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing when using route E, and pWrepresents the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing when using route W.

All conditions for inference were met, and the resulting p-value was 0.37. Which of the following is the correct decision for the test?

The p-value is less than α, and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes.

Answer A: The p -value is less than alpha , and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes.

A
The p-value is greater than α, and the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is the same for the different routes.

Answer B: The p -value is greater than alpha , and the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is the same for the different routes.

B
The p-value is greater than α, and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is not convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes.

Answer C: The p -value is greater than alpha , and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is not convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes.

C
The p-value is greater than α, and the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is not convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes.

Answer D: The p -value is greater than alpha , and the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is not convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes.

D
The p-value is greater than α, and the null hypothesis is rejected. There is convincing evidence to support the claim that the proportion of times she needs to stop at the crossing is different for the different routes.

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

$Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Proportions$

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions