Minnesota had the highest tumout rate of any state for the 2016 presidential election.t Political analysts wonder if turnout registered voters from rural Minnesota voted in the 2016 presidential election, while 378 out of 525 registered voters from urban Minnesota voted. rural Minnesota was higher than turnout in the urban areas of the state. A sample shows that 648 of 864 (a) Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses that can be used to test whether registered voters in rural Minnesota were more likely than registered voters in urban Minnesota to vote in the 2016 presidential election. (Let P1 = the population proportion of voters in rural Minnesota who voted in the 2016 election and p, = the population proportion of voters in urban Minnesota who voted in the 2016 election.) o Ho: P1- P2 0 H P1- P2 < 0 Ho: P1- P2= 0 H P1- P2 # 0 Ho P1- P25 0 Hai P1- P2>0 o Ho: P1- P2* 0 Hai P1- P2 = 0 OF Ho: P1- P2<0 H P1- P2 = 0 (b) What is the proportion of sampled registered voters in rural Minnesota that voted in the 2016 presidential election? (c) What is the proportion of sampled registered voters in urban Minnesota that voted in the 2016 presidential election? (d) At a = 0.05, test the political analysts' hypothesis. Calculate the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) What is the p-value? (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value = What conclusion do you draw from your results? O Do not reject Ho. We can conclude that voters from rural Minnesota voted more frequently than voters from urban Minnesota in the 2016 Presidential election. O Reject Ho: We cannot conclude that voters from rural Minnesota voted more frequently than voters from urban Minnesota in the 2016 Presidential election. O Reject Ho: We can conclude that voters from rural Minnesota voted more frequently than voters from urban Minnesota in the 2016 Presidential election. O Do not reject H. We cannot conclude that voters from rural Minnesota voted more frequently than voters from urban Minnesota in the 2016 Presidential election.
Minnesota had the highest tumout rate of any state for the 2016 presidential election.t Political analysts wonder if turnout registered voters from rural Minnesota voted in the 2016 presidential election, while 378 out of 525 registered voters from urban Minnesota voted. rural Minnesota was higher than turnout in the urban areas of the state. A sample shows that 648 of 864 (a) Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses that can be used to test whether registered voters in rural Minnesota were more likely than registered voters in urban Minnesota to vote in the 2016 presidential election. (Let P1 = the population proportion of voters in rural Minnesota who voted in the 2016 election and p, = the population proportion of voters in urban Minnesota who voted in the 2016 election.) o Ho: P1- P2 0 H P1- P2 < 0 Ho: P1- P2= 0 H P1- P2 # 0 Ho P1- P25 0 Hai P1- P2>0 o Ho: P1- P2* 0 Hai P1- P2 = 0 OF Ho: P1- P2<0 H P1- P2 = 0 (b) What is the proportion of sampled registered voters in rural Minnesota that voted in the 2016 presidential election? (c) What is the proportion of sampled registered voters in urban Minnesota that voted in the 2016 presidential election? (d) At a = 0.05, test the political analysts' hypothesis. Calculate the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) What is the p-value? (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value = What conclusion do you draw from your results? O Do not reject Ho. We can conclude that voters from rural Minnesota voted more frequently than voters from urban Minnesota in the 2016 Presidential election. O Reject Ho: We cannot conclude that voters from rural Minnesota voted more frequently than voters from urban Minnesota in the 2016 Presidential election. O Reject Ho: We can conclude that voters from rural Minnesota voted more frequently than voters from urban Minnesota in the 2016 Presidential election. O Do not reject H. We cannot conclude that voters from rural Minnesota voted more frequently than voters from urban Minnesota in the 2016 Presidential election.
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.6: Summarizing Categorical Data
Problem 30PPS
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 4 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL