proposed Lewis structure :Z: =N :Z: N=N :Z: I :Z: Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* * If two or more atoms of the same element don't satisfy the octet rule, just enter the chemical symbol as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms don't satisfy the octet rule, enter "0.0".

proposed Lewis structure :Z: =N :Z: N=N :Z: I :Z: Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* * If two or more atoms of the same element don't satisfy the octet rule, just enter the chemical symbol as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms don't satisfy the octet rule, enter "0.0".

Chemistry for Engineering Students

4th Edition

ISBN:9781337398909

Author:Lawrence S. Brown, Tom Holme

Publisher:Lawrence S. Brown, Tom Holme

Chapter7: Chemical Bonding And Molecular Structure

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7.30PAE: 7.30 The bond in HF is said to be polar, with the hydrogen carrying a partial positive charge. For...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

7.30 The bond in HF is said to be polar, with the hydrogen carrying a partial positive charge. For this to be true, the hydrogen atom must have less than one electron around it. Yet the Lewis dot structure of HF attributes two electrons to hydrogen. Draw a picture of the electron density distribution for HF and use it to describe how the hydrogen atom can carry a partial positive charge. How can these two models of the HF bond (the electron density and the Lewis structure) seem so different and yet describe the same thing?
It is impossible to draw a legitimate Lewis structure of a neutral NH4 molecule. Hypothetically,how many valence electrons would such a neutral NH4 molecule have ifit could exist? a. The +1 cation, NH4+ , does exist. How many valence electrons does one NH4+ ion have? b. Draw the Lewis structure for NH4+
ed Lewis struc :: :Z: : Z: |d=8: the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:*
Decide wnether these proposed Lewis structures are reasonable. proposed Lewis structure : 0: H = Br : 0: :0-C- O: HIC C-H Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 * If two or more atoms of the same element don't satisfy the octet rule, just enter the chemical symbol as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms don't satisfy the octet rule, enter "O,0". X
Decide whether these proposed Lewis structures are reasonable. proposed Lewis structure : H :Z: :Z: N H I H-N-H Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 * If two or more atoms of the same element don't satisfy the octet rule, just enter the chemical symbol as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms don't satisfy the octet rule, enter "0,0".
Decide whether these proposed Lewis structures are reasonable. proposed Lewis structure :Z: N | : 0: N H- Br: .. : 0: C=0 Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are: * Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are: * * If two or more atoms of the same element don't satisfy the octet rule, just enter the chemical symbol as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms don't satisfy the octet rule, enter "0,0".
Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? proposed Lewis molecule structure Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. OF, :F F: The correct number is:|| - No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: Yes, it's a reasonable structure. :F: No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. BF3 The correct number is: :F В F: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. - .. The symbols of the problem atoms are: Yes, it's a reasonable structure. :F: No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. CIF3 | The correct number is: | :F СІ — F: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: * If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just enter the chemical symbol for the atom as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms have the wrong number of electrons around…
P ed Lewis structure Cl =0. :0 :Z: C=N :C=0: Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:*
molecule proposed Lewis structure PF₁ 4 CIO CH : P - F :F: :F: :0 0-2-0 :0: 0: H | H-C-H + Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: * If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just enter the chemical symbol for the atom as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms have the wrong number of electrons around…
Decide whether these proposed Lewis structures are reasonable. proposed Lewis structure H : 0: - C. | : 0: : 0: H H O H-CEN: H Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* * If two or more atoms of the same element don't satisfy the octet rule, just enter the chemical symbol as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms don't satisfy the octet rule, enter "O,O". X 5
Decide whether the Lewis structure proposed for each molecule is reasonable or not. molecule proposed Lewis structure 9 CIF 3 BH3 :0 0-0: :F- FIN: :F: :ö: || : F: -F: H B H 1 H Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? OYes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: OO Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: OYes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 * If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just enter the chemical symbol for the atom as…
Decide whether these proposed Lewis structures are reasonable. proposed Lewis structure H-C=N :Z: - O : 0: :C1= T :0: :5: CI: Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. 0 The symbols of the problem atoms are: * Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 * If two or more atoms of the same element don't satisfy the octet rule, just enter the chemical symbol as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms don't satisfy the octet rule, enter "0,0". X