Requirements of the Offer. Technical ConsumerProducts, Inc. (TCP), makes and distributes energy-ecientlighting products. Emily Bahr was TCP’s district sales manager in Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota whenthe company announced the details of a bonus plan. A districtsales manager who achieved 100 percent year-over-year salesgrowth and a 42 percent gross margin would earn 200 percentof his or her base salary as a bonus. TCP retained absolutediscretion to modify the plan. Bahr’s base salary was $42,500.Her final sales results for the year showed 113 percent yearover-year sales growth and a 42 percent gross margin. Sheanticipated a bonus of $85,945, but TCP could not aord topay the bonuses as planned, and Bahr received only $34,229.In response to Bahr’s claim for breach of contract, TCP arguedthat the bonus plan was too indefinite to be an oer. Is TCPcorrect? Explain. [Bahr v. Technical Consumer Products, Inc.,601 Fed.Appx. 359 (6th Cir. 2015)] (See Agreement.)

Principles of Accounting Volume 2
19th Edition
ISBN:9781947172609
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax
Chapter3: Cost-volume-profit Analysis
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 9EA: Brahma Industries sells vinyl replacement windows to home improvement retailers nationwide. The...
icon
Related questions
Question

Requirements of the Offer. Technical Consumer
Products, Inc. (TCP), makes and distributes energy-ecient
lighting products. Emily Bahr was TCP’s district sales manager in Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota when
the company announced the details of a bonus plan. A district
sales manager who achieved 100 percent year-over-year sales
growth and a 42 percent gross margin would earn 200 percent
of his or her base salary as a bonus. TCP retained absolute
discretion to modify the plan. Bahr’s base salary was $42,500.
Her final sales results for the year showed 113 percent yearover-year sales growth and a 42 percent gross margin. She
anticipated a bonus of $85,945, but TCP could not aord to
pay the bonuses as planned, and Bahr received only $34,229.
In response to Bahr’s claim for breach of contract, TCP argued
that the bonus plan was too indefinite to be an oer. Is TCP
correct? Explain. [Bahr v. Technical Consumer Products, Inc.,
601 Fed.Appx. 359 (6th Cir. 2015)] (See Agreement.)

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Revenue Recognition
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Accounting
ISBN:
9781947172609
Author:
OpenStax
Publisher:
OpenStax College
SWFT Corp Partner Estates Trusts
SWFT Corp Partner Estates Trusts
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357161548
Author:
Raabe
Publisher:
Cengage
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser…
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305970663
Author:
Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:
Cengage Learning