s the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south lower than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 413 of the 562 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 422 of the 548 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the = 0.05 level of significance? For this study, we should use The null and alternative hypotheses would be: (please enter a decimal) (Please enter a decimal) The test statistic = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) The p-value is Based on this, we should the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 562 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is lower than the proportion of the 548 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.05, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is lower than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is lower than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.

Name: Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south lower tha
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:00.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south lower than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 413 of the 562 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 422 of the 548 randomly se

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018

18th Edition

ISBN:9780079039897

Author:Carter

Publisher:Carter

Chapter10: Statistics

Section10.6: Summarizing Categorical Data

Problem 30PPS

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Concept explainers

Topic Video

Question

Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south lower than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 413 of the 562 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 422 of the 548 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the = 0.05 level of significance?

For this study, we should use
The null and alternative hypotheses would be:

(please enter a decimal)

(Please enter a decimal)

The test statistic = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
The p-value is
Based on this, we should the null hypothesis.
Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
- The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
- The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 562 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is lower than the proportion of the 548 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.
- The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.05, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is lower than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
- The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is lower than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

$Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Proportions$

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.