ShoeZoo, Inc. is an athletic shoe and apparel company that is struggling to compete with much larger companies in its industry. One of ShoeZoo's main assets is that it has Billy Paultz, a rookie NBA basketball player, as its main endorser. SportGiant, Inc. offered to purchase ShoeZoo at a price that was $10/share over the company's appraised value. ShoeZoo's board of directors approved the offer after a 15 minute meeting and without soliciting other offers. Six months later, Billy Paultz became a huge star and the value of the company skyrocketed. The former shareholders of ShoeZoo sued. Will the directors be liable? 1) Yes, because the board made an uninformed decision. 2) Yes, because the board breached its duty of care. 3) No, because the board had a meeting, even if it was only 15 minutes. O 4) No, if the directors can prove that both the process and the decision were fair to the shareholders.

Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)
11th Edition
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Chapter1: Quality Auditing: Why It Matters
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8RQSC
icon
Related questions
Question
ShoeZoo, Inc. is an athletic shoe and apparel company that is struggling to
compete with much larger companies in its industry. One of ShoeZoo's main assets
is that it has Billy Paultz, a rookie NBA basketball player, as its main endorser.
SportGiant, Inc. offered to purchase ShoeZoo at a price that was $10/share over the
company's appraised value. ShoeZoo's board of directors approved the offer after a
15 minute meeting and without soliciting other offers. Six months later, Billy Paultz
became a huge star and the value of the company skyrocketed. The former
shareholders of ShoeZoo sued. Will the directors be liable?
1) Yes, because the board made an uninformed decision.
2) Yes, because the board breached its duty of care.
O 3) No, because the board had a meeting, even if it was only 15 minutes.
No, if the directors can prove that both the process and the decision were
4)
fair to the shareholders.
Transcribed Image Text:ShoeZoo, Inc. is an athletic shoe and apparel company that is struggling to compete with much larger companies in its industry. One of ShoeZoo's main assets is that it has Billy Paultz, a rookie NBA basketball player, as its main endorser. SportGiant, Inc. offered to purchase ShoeZoo at a price that was $10/share over the company's appraised value. ShoeZoo's board of directors approved the offer after a 15 minute meeting and without soliciting other offers. Six months later, Billy Paultz became a huge star and the value of the company skyrocketed. The former shareholders of ShoeZoo sued. Will the directors be liable? 1) Yes, because the board made an uninformed decision. 2) Yes, because the board breached its duty of care. O 3) No, because the board had a meeting, even if it was only 15 minutes. No, if the directors can prove that both the process and the decision were 4) fair to the shareholders.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L…
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619455
Author:
Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:
Cengage Learning