Students estimated the length of one minute without reference to a watch or clock, and the times (seconds) are listed below. Assume that a simple random sample has been selected. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that these times are from a population with a mean equal to 60 seconds. Does it appear that students are reasonably good at estimating one minute? 70 81 40 66 44 22 62 61 65 48 64 68 98 91 67 Perform the test assuming that the requirements are met. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: ▼ sigmaσ muμ pp ▼ less than< greater than> not equals≠ equals= enter your response here H1: ▼ sigmaσ pp muμ ▼ equals= less than< greater than> not equals≠ enter your response here (Type integers or decimals. Do not round.) Part 2 Identify the test statistic. enter your response here (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Part 3 Identify the P-value. enter your response here (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Part 4 State the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Decide whether it appears that students are reasonably good at estimating one minute. ▼ Fail to reject Accept Reject the null hypothesis. There ▼ is not is sufficient evidence at the 0.05 significance level to ▼ support warrant rejection of the claim that the times are from a population with a mean equal to 60 seconds; on this basis it ▼ does not appear appears that as a group the students are reasonably good at estimating one minute.
Students estimated the length of one minute without reference to a watch or clock, and the times (seconds) are listed below. Assume that a simple random sample has been selected. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that these times are from a population with a mean equal to 60 seconds. Does it appear that students are reasonably good at estimating one minute? 70 81 40 66 44 22 62 61 65 48 64 68 98 91 67 Perform the test assuming that the requirements are met. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: ▼ sigmaσ muμ pp ▼ less than< greater than> not equals≠ equals= enter your response here H1: ▼ sigmaσ pp muμ ▼ equals= less than< greater than> not equals≠ enter your response here (Type integers or decimals. Do not round.) Part 2 Identify the test statistic. enter your response here (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Part 3 Identify the P-value. enter your response here (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Part 4 State the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Decide whether it appears that students are reasonably good at estimating one minute. ▼ Fail to reject Accept Reject the null hypothesis. There ▼ is not is sufficient evidence at the 0.05 significance level to ▼ support warrant rejection of the claim that the times are from a population with a mean equal to 60 seconds; on this basis it ▼ does not appear appears that as a group the students are reasonably good at estimating one minute.
Calculus For The Life Sciences
2nd Edition
ISBN:9780321964038
Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Chapter13: Probability And Calculus
Section13.3: Special Probability Density Functions
Problem 40E: Pygmy Height The average height of a member of a certain tribe of pygmies is 3.2ft, with a standard...
Related questions
Question
Students estimated the length of one minute without reference to a watch or clock, and the times (seconds) are listed below. Assume that a simple random sample has been selected. Use a
0.05
significance level to test the claim that these times are from a population with a mean equal to
60
seconds. Does it appear that students are reasonably good at estimating one minute?|
70
|
81
|
40
|
66
|
44
|
22
|
62
|
61
|
|
|
65
|
48
|
64
|
68
|
98
|
91
|
67
|
|
|
Perform the test assuming that the requirements are met. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses.
H0:
▼
sigmaσ
muμ
pp
▼
less than<
greater than>
not equals≠
equals=
H1:
▼
sigmaσ
pp
muμ
▼
equals=
less than<
greater than>
not equals≠
(Type integers or decimals. Do not round.)
Part 2
Identify the test statistic.
enter your response here
(Round to two decimal places as needed.)
Part 3
Identify the P-value.
enter your response here
(Round to three decimal places as needed.)
Part 4
State the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Decide whether it appears that students are reasonably good at estimating one minute.
▼
Fail to reject
Accept
Reject
▼
is not
is
0.05
significance level to
▼
support
warrant rejection of
60
seconds; on this basis it
▼
does not appear
appears
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 3 images
Recommended textbooks for you
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill