Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high-tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they decide upon the size of theirresearch budget:Dynaco's DecisionSynergy's DecisionLarge BudgetLarge Budget $40 million, $30 millionSmall Budget$0, $30 millionIf Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a large budget, it will choose a ▼ budget. If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a small budget, it willchoose a budget. Therefore, Synergya dominant strategy.TrueSmall Budget$60 million, $0$50 million, $40 millionIf Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a small budget, it willchoose abudget. Therefore, Dynacoa dominant strategy.O FalseTrue or False: There is a Nash equilibrium for this scenario. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.)

Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high-tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they decide upon the size of their research budget: Dynaco's Decision Synergy's Decision Large Budget Large Budget $40 million, $30 million Small Budget $0, $30 million If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a large budget, it will choose a choose a budget. Therefore, Synergy O True Small Budget $60 million, $0 $50 million, $40 million O False If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Dynaco a dominant strategy. budget. If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a small budget, it will a dominant strategy. True or False: There is a Nash equilibrium for this scenario. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.)

Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high-tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they decide upon the size of their research budget: Dynaco's Decision Synergy's Decision Large Budget Large Budget $40 million, $30 million Small Budget $0, $30 million If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a large budget, it will choose a choose a budget. Therefore, Synergy O True Small Budget $60 million, $0 $50 million, $40 million O False If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Dynaco a dominant strategy. budget. If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a small budget, it will a dominant strategy. True or False: There is a Nash equilibrium for this scenario. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.)

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter15: Oligopoly And Strategic Behavior

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 14P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Jagtar and Ravi both grow mangoes, which they sell in the same local market. They are deciding whether to pick 5 baskets worth of mangoes or 10 baskets, and have the following profit matrix: Jagtar 5 1 17 5 1 22 16 14 Ravi 1 24 14 a. What is the Nash equilibrium if both individuals make their decisions simultaneously? b. Does your analysis change if the local market charges a lump-sum fee of 12 to set up a stall and sell the mangoes in the space it provides? c. What would happen if the local market were instead to charge a lump-sum fee of 18?
Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high-tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they decide upon the size of their research budget: Dynaco's Decision Synergy's Decision Large Budget Large Budget $30 million, $20 million Small Budget $0, $30 million If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Synergy a dominant strategy. O True Small Budget $70 million, $0 $50 million, $40 million If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Dynaco a dominant strategy. O False True or False: There is a Nash equilibrium for this scenario. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.)
8. To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that Creamland and Dairy King are the only two firms that sell ice cream. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Creamland Dairy King Advertises Doesn't Advertise 9,9 Doesn't Advertise 3, 15 Advertises 15, 3 11, 11 For example, the upper-right cell shows that, if Creamland advertises and Dairy King doesn't advertise, Creamland will make a profit of $15 million, and Dairy King will make a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Creamland and Dairy King are both profit-maximizing firms. If Creamland decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ not advertise. If Creamland decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ does not advertise. million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of $ If Dairy King advertises, Creamland makes a higher profit if it chooses million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of $…
At a time when demand for ready-to-eat cereal was stagnant, a spokesperson for the cereal maker Kellogg’s was quoted as saying, “ . . . for the past several years, our individual company growth has come out of the other fellow’s hide.” Kellogg’s has been producing cereal since 1906 and continues to implement strategies that make it a leader in the cereal industry. Suppose that when Kellogg’s and its largest rival advertise, each company earns $0 billion in profits. When neither company advertises, each company earns profits of $8 billion.If one company advertises and the other does not, the company that advertises earns $43 billion and the company that does not advertise loses $4 billion. For what range of interest rates could these firms use trigger strategies to support the collusive level of advertising?Instruction: Enter your response as a percentage rounded to the nearest whole number.i ≤ percent
12. To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that two firms, Hatte Latte and Bean Bruuer, are the only sellers of espresso in some hypothetical market. The following payoff matrix gives the profit (in millions of dollars) earned by each company depending on whether or not it chooses to advertise: Bean Bruuer Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise Hatte Latte Doesn't Advertise 9,9 3,15 15,3 11, 11 For example, the lower left cell of the matrix shows that if Bean Bruuer advertises and Hatte Latte does not advertise, Bean Bruuer will make a profit of $15 million, and Hatte Latte will make a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Hatte Latte and Bean Bruuer are both profit-maximizing firms. If Hatte Latte chooses to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ does not advertise. million if Bean Bruuer advertises and a profit of $ million if Bean Bruuer If Hatte Latte chooses not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ does not advertise. million if Bean Bruuer…
At a time when demand for ready-to-eat cereal was stagnant, a spokesperson for the cereal maker Kellogg’s was quoted as saying, “ . . . for the past several years, our individual company growth has come out of the other fellow’s hide.” Kellogg’s has been producing cereal since 1906 and continues to implement strategies that make it a leader in the cereal industry. Suppose that when Kellogg’s and its largest rival advertise, each company earns $2 billion in profits. When neither company advertises, each company earns profits of $16 billion.If one company advertises and the other does not, the company that advertises earns $56 billion and the company that does not advertise loses $4 billion. For what range of interest rates could these firms use trigger strategies to support the collusive level of advertising?Instruction: Enter your response as a percentage rounded to the nearest whole number.
Firm 2 Sell Give away. Sell 1: $3 2: $3 1: -$1 2: $4 Firm 1 Give away. 1: $4 2: -$1 1: $2 2: $2 Two software firms have developed an identical new software application. They are debating whether to give the new app away free and then sell add-ons or sell the application at $30 a copy. The payoff matrix is above and the payoffs are profits in millions of dollars. What is Firm 1's best strategy? O Give away the application only if Firm 2 sells the application. O Sell the application at $30 a copy regardless of what Firm 2 does. ● Give away the application regardless of what Firm 2 does. O Give away the application only if Firm 2 gives away the application.
At a time when demand for ready-to-eat cereal was stagnant, a spokesperson for the cereal maker Kellogg’s was quoted as saying, “ . . . for the past several years, our individual company growth has come out of the other fellow’s hide.” Kellogg’s has been producing cereal since 1906 and continues to implement strategies that make it a leader in the cereal industry. Suppose that when Kellogg’s and its largest rival advertise, each company earns $0 in profits. When neither company advertises, each company earns profits of $12 billion. If one company advertises and the other does not, the company that advertises earns $52 billion and the company that does not advertise loses $4 billion. Under what conditions could these firms use trigger strategies to support the collusive level of advertising?
Jims diner is just about to open in memphis, tennessee. however, jim is trying to decide whether he wants to offer coke or pepsi soda products. he determines that, to offer either product, he will have to spend $1500 in sunk costs to purchase and install the appropriate paraphernalia. Ultimately, he chooses to offer coke products and agrees to pay coke 5 cents per ounce of coke sold for the right to use its product. After jim makes the investments specific to his soda choice, coke returns and asks for a fixed (One-time) fee in addition to 5 cents per ounce. What is the most jim should be willing to pay? explain
Budweiser Medium High 90, 70 60, 50 Low 120, 90 100, 70 Low 115, 100 Miller Medium 130, 60 High 90, 20 120, 40 100, 80 Numbers in each cell are profits from the size of an advertising budget- Miller first (in bold), then Budweiser. Two beer companies face the payoff table above for choosing an advertising budget. Does this decision problem have a Nash equilibrium? If so, what is it? Select one: O a. Yes. Low for Miller , Low for Budweiser. O b. No. There is no Nash equilibrium. O c. Yes. Low for Miller, Medium for Budweiser. O d. Yes. High for Miller, High for Budweiser.
II.2 Companies A and B can compete on advertising or R&D. The profits (in millions of $ million) of the two firms are given in the table below assumig that they play a one-shot simultancous mov game (the profit or firm A is listed first in every cell of the matrix, followed by the profit of firm B): Advertising R&D 50, 25 10, 70 20, 40 60, 35 1. Find the mixed strategy equilibrium. A\B Advertising R&D 2. What are the expected profits for both firms in this equilibrium?
Company A and Company B are competing oligopolists. Both companies are considering increasing or maintaining their prices The payoff matrix shows the profits of the companies in millions based on their possible actions. Company B Increase Price Maintain Price Company A Increase Price $50, $40 $35, 530 Maintain Price 555, $45 $60, $35 The government offers a $5 milon subsidy to maintain current pricing. What is the expected outcome of the new payoff matrix, given the subsidy? The Nash equilibrium changes, and both companies will maintain their prices O The Nash equilbrium changes, and both companies will increase their prices O The Nash equilibrium remains the same, and both companies will increase their prices O Company A wit increase its price, whie Company B maintains its price. O Company A will maintain its price, while Company Bincreases ts price.