The cost-to-profit graph for two mines using different types of copper extraction, smelting and bioleaching, is shown. Both mines are estimated to contain one million tons of copper. 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 Cost Cost to Profit Profit Key Smelting Bioleaching Based on the graph, which method of obtaining copper is likely the most cost-effective? A Using smelting has lower cleanup costs than bioleaching. Using smelting is cheaper and generates more profit than bioleaching. © Bioleaching harvests the copper in a shorter time period than smelting. ℗ Bioleaching is more expensive at first but the returns are much higher than smelting. O A O B ○ D hp

Glencoe Physics: Principles and Problems, Student Edition
1st Edition
ISBN:9780078807213
Author:Paul W. Zitzewitz
Publisher:Paul W. Zitzewitz
Chapter1: A Physics Toolkit
Section1.4: Graphing Data
Problem 21PP
icon
Related questions
Question
The cost-to-profit graph for two mines using different types of copper extraction, smelting
and bioleaching, is shown. Both mines are estimated to contain one million tons of copper.
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
Cost
Cost to Profit
Profit
Key
Smelting
Bioleaching
Based on the graph, which method of obtaining copper is likely the most cost-effective?
A Using smelting has lower cleanup costs than bioleaching.
Using smelting is cheaper and generates more profit than bioleaching.
© Bioleaching harvests the copper in a shorter time period than smelting.
℗ Bioleaching is more expensive at first but the returns are much higher than smelting.
O A
O B
○ D
hp
Transcribed Image Text:The cost-to-profit graph for two mines using different types of copper extraction, smelting and bioleaching, is shown. Both mines are estimated to contain one million tons of copper. 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 Cost Cost to Profit Profit Key Smelting Bioleaching Based on the graph, which method of obtaining copper is likely the most cost-effective? A Using smelting has lower cleanup costs than bioleaching. Using smelting is cheaper and generates more profit than bioleaching. © Bioleaching harvests the copper in a shorter time period than smelting. ℗ Bioleaching is more expensive at first but the returns are much higher than smelting. O A O B ○ D hp
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Physics: Principles and Problems, Student…
Glencoe Physics: Principles and Problems, Student…
Physics
ISBN:
9780078807213
Author:
Paul W. Zitzewitz
Publisher:
Glencoe/McGraw-Hill
An Introduction to Physical Science
An Introduction to Physical Science
Physics
ISBN:
9781305079137
Author:
James Shipman, Jerry D. Wilson, Charles A. Higgins, Omar Torres
Publisher:
Cengage Learning