The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is considering two designs for crash barriers along a reconstructed portion of 1-10. Design 2B will cost $3 million to install and $138,000 per year to maintain. Design 4R will cost $3.7 million to install and $65,000 per year to maintain. Determine which design should be selected based on a rate of return analysis if TxDOT uses a MARR of 6% per year and a 20-year project period. The rate of return is Design (Click to select) %. is selected.

The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is considering two designs for crash barriers along a reconstructed portion of 1-10. Design 2B will cost $3 million to install and $138,000 per year to maintain. Design 4R will cost $3.7 million to install and $65,000 per year to maintain. Determine which design should be selected based on a rate of return analysis if TxDOT uses a MARR of 6% per year and a 20-year project period. The rate of return is Design (Click to select) %. is selected.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A new highway is to be constructed. Design A calls for a concrete pavement costing $90 per foot with a 12-year life; two paved ditches costing $4 per foot each; and two box culverts every mile, each costing $7,000 and having a 12-year life. Annual maintenance will cost $1,700 per mile; the culverts must be cleaned every three years at a cost of $550 each per mile. Design B calls for a bituminous pavement costing $40 per foot with a 6-year life; three sodded ditches costing $1.50 per foot each; and three pipe culverts every mile, each costing $2,100 and having a 6-year life. The replacement culverts will cost $2,350 each. Annual maintenance will cost $2,600 per mile; the culverts must be cleaned yearly at a cost of $230 each per mile; and the annual ditch maintenance will cost $1.30 per foot per ditch. Compare the two designs on the basis of equivalent worth per mile for a 12-year period. Find the most economical design on the basis of AW and PW if the MARR is 6% per year. Click the…
Advanced Modular Technology (AMT) makes energy cleaner, safer, more secure and more efficient. It typically exhibits net annual revenues that increase over a fairly long period. In the long run, an AMT project may be profitable as measured by IRR, but its simple payback period may be unacceptable. Evaluate this AMT project using the IRR method when the company MARR is 13% per year and its maximum allowable payback period is two years. What is your recommendation? $98,000 $2,000 + Capital investment at time 0 Net revenues in year k $10,000 • (k- 1) $9,000 Market (salvage) value Life 4 years
The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is considering two designs for crash barriers along a reconstructed portion of 1-10. Design 2B will cost $3 million to install and $135,000 per year to maintain. Design 4R will cost $3.7 million to install and $55,000 per year to maintain. Determine which design should be selected based on a rate of return analysis if TxDOT uses a MARR of 6% per year and a 20-year project period. The rate of return is Design (Click to select) is selected. (Click to select) 28 4R %. 2B
The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is considering two designs for crash barriers along a reconstructed portion of I-10. Design 2B will cost $3 million to install and $125,500 per year to maintain. Design 4R will cost $3.7 million to install and $55,000 per year to maintain. Determine which design should be selected based on a rate of return analysis if TxDOT uses a MARR of 6% per year and a 20-year project period. The rate of return is Not attempted ______%.
The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is considering two designs for crash barriers along a reconstructed portion of I-10. Design 2B will cost $3 million to install and $128,500 per year to maintain. Design 4R will cost $3.7 million to install and $55,000 per year to maintain. Determine which design should be selected based on a rate of return analysis if TxDOT uses a MARR of 6% per year and a 20-year project period. The rate of return is %. Design is selected. 4R OR 2B
Alternative A and B are two mutually exclusive cost alternatives, and one of them must be selected. Using Incremental Analysis, which of the alternatives should be recommended based on ERR (the External Rate of Return)? · MARR (Minimum acceptable rate of return) is 12% per year while the re-investment rate is 10% per year. The study period is 20 years. Assume repeatability is appropriate for this comparison. Alternative A B $ (101,000) $ (6,000) 20 years $ (6,000) $ (18,500 ) 10 years Initial capital investment Annual operating expenses Useful life Salvage value None None
The engineering team at Manuel's Manufacturing, Inc., is planning to purchase an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. The software and installation from Vendor A costs $380,000 initially and is expected to increase revenue $125,000 per year every year. The software and installation from Vendor B costs $280,000 and is expected to increase revenue $95,000 per year. Manuel's uses a 4-year planning horizon and a 10% per year MARR. Which ERP system should Manuel purchase? (A) Vendor B (B) Vendor A
A new highway is to be constructed. Design A calls for a concrete pavement costing $85 per foot with a 16-year life; three paved ditches costing $4 per foot each; and four box culverts every mile, each costing $8,000 and having a 16-year life. Annual maintenance will cost $1,700 per mile; the culverts must be cleaned every four years at a cost of $400 each per mile. Design B calls for a bituminous pavement costing $40 per foot with a 8-year I four sodded ditches costing $1.45 per foot each; and two pipe culverts every mile, each costing $2,200 and having a 8-year life. The replacement culverts will cost $2,500 each. Annual maintenance will cost $2,600 per mile; the culverts must be cleaned yearly at a cost of $220 each per mile; and the annual ditch maintenance will cost $1.65 per foot per ditch. Compare the two designs on the basis of equivalent worth per mile for a 16-year period. Find the most economical design on the basis of AW and PW if the MARR is 8% per year. Click the icon to…
An industrial coal-fired boiler for process steam is equipped with a 10-year-old electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Changes in coal quality have caused stack emissions to be in noncompliance with federal standards for particulates. Two mutually exclusive alternatives have been proposed to rectify this problem (doing nothing is not an option). The MARR is 9% per year. Make a recommendation regarding which alternative to select. 3. An industrial coal-fired boiler for process steam is equipped with a 10-year-old electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Changes in coal quality have caused stack emissions to be in noncompliance with federal standards for particulates. Two mutually exclusive alternatives have been proposed to rectify this problem (doing nothing is not an option). Capital investment Annual operating expenses Useful Life New Baghouse $1,140,000 $115,500 10 years New ESP $992,500 $73,200 10 years The MARR is 9% per year. Make a recommendation regarding which alternative to select.
A tunnel to transport water initially cost $1,000,000 and has expected maintenance costs that will occur in a 6-year cycle as shown below, assume MARR is 10% per year. End of Year: 3 Maintenance: $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $45,000 $45,000 $60,000 Compute the Equivalent Annual Cost of the maintenance. Hint: Don't insert the negative sign Compute the Capitalized Cost? Hint: Don't insert the negative sign
Determine the ERR of the engineering project shown below when the MARR is 189% per year and the reinvestment rate is 15% per year. Express your answer in percent rounded to the nearest hundredths. Investment cost $10,290 Expected life 7 years Market (salvage) value $894 Annual receipts $9,168| Annual expenses $5,191
A dyeing and finishing plant is interested in acquiring a dyeing machine for the production of a new product. Three alternatives are being considered assummarized below. Which alternative should be recommended if the plant’sMARR (hurdle rate) is 15% per year using (a) the IRR method and (b) the annual worth method?