To evaluate the effect of a treatment, a sample is obtained from a population with a mean of B 40, and the treatment is administered to the individuals in the sample. After treatment, the sample mean is found to be M = 44.5 with a variance of s² = 36. If the sample consists of n 16 individuals, are the data sufficient to conclude that the treatment has a significant effect using a two-tailed test with a = .05? O For these data, t-1.50. This value is less than the critical value of 2.131, so we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant treatment effect. O For these data, t-3.00. This value is greater than the critical value of 2.131, so we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant treatment effect. O For these data, t = 4.50. This value is greater than the critical value of 2.131, so we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant treatment effect. O For these data, t-1.50. This value is less than the critical value of 2.131, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is NOT a significant treatment effect.

Calculus For The Life Sciences
2nd Edition
ISBN:9780321964038
Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Chapter13: Probability And Calculus
Section13.2: Expected Value And Variance Of Continuous Random Variables
Problem 10E
icon
Related questions
Question
To evaluate the effect of a treatment, a sample is obtained from a population with a mean of
=40, and the treatment is administered to the individuals in the sample. After treatment,
the sample mean is found to be M = 44.5 with a variance of s² = 36.
If the sample consists of n = 16 individuals, are the data sufficient to conclude that the
treatment has a significant effect using a two-tailed test with a = .05?
O For these data, t= 1.50. This value is less than the critical value of 2.131, so we reject the null
hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant treatment effect.
O For these data, t = 3.00. This value is greater than the critical value of 2.131, so we reject the null
hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant treatment effect.
O For these data, t = 4.50. This value is greater than the critical value of 2.131, so we reject the null
hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant treatment effect.
O For these data, t = 1.50. This value is less than the critical value of 2.131, so we fail to reject the null
hypothesis and conclude that there is NOT a significant treatment effect.
Transcribed Image Text:To evaluate the effect of a treatment, a sample is obtained from a population with a mean of =40, and the treatment is administered to the individuals in the sample. After treatment, the sample mean is found to be M = 44.5 with a variance of s² = 36. If the sample consists of n = 16 individuals, are the data sufficient to conclude that the treatment has a significant effect using a two-tailed test with a = .05? O For these data, t= 1.50. This value is less than the critical value of 2.131, so we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant treatment effect. O For these data, t = 3.00. This value is greater than the critical value of 2.131, so we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant treatment effect. O For these data, t = 4.50. This value is greater than the critical value of 2.131, so we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant treatment effect. O For these data, t = 1.50. This value is less than the critical value of 2.131, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is NOT a significant treatment effect.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,