Use the 2x2 game matrix below to answer the next few questions. It depicts the various profit outcomes of two breweries who are deciding what type of beer to bring to the market. The payoffs in the upper right accrue to the top brewery and the payoffs to the lower left accrue to the left player. What is the Nash Equilibrium? Both playing IPA Both playing Porter Bronx playing IPA; Brooklyn playing Porter Bronx playing Porter; Brooklyn playing IPA Bronx Brewery IPA Porter 90 50 IPA Brooklyn Brewery 30 80 60 120 105 100 Porter 50 70

Use the 2x2 game matrix below to answer the next few questions. It depicts the various profit outcomes of two breweries who are deciding what type of beer to bring to the market. The payoffs in the upper right accrue to the top brewery and the payoffs to the lower left accrue to the left player. What is the Nash Equilibrium? Both playing IPA Both playing Porter Bronx playing IPA; Brooklyn playing Porter Bronx playing Porter; Brooklyn playing IPA Bronx Brewery IPA Porter 90 50 IPA Brooklyn Brewery 30 80 60 120 105 100 Porter 50 70

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305971493

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter17: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The table given below represents the payoff matrix of firms A and B, when they choose to produce low or high output. In each cell, the figure on the left indicates Firm B's payoffs and the figure on the right indicates Firm A's payoffs. Firm A Firm B Low Output High Output Low Output 60 50 20 10 High Output 30 40 40 30 Which of the following statements about the two firms must be true? 1. If Firm B produces low output, Firm A will also produce low output. 2. If Firm B produces high output, Firm A will produce low output. 3. If Firm A produces high output, Firm B will also produce high output. 4. If Firm A produces low output, Firm B will produce high output.
Give typing answer with explanation and conclusion Suppose two firms produce identical good. The inverse demand curve for the good is: P = 240-Q, where Q is the total quantity produced by the two firms. Each firm has a constant marginal cost 20 of producing the good and fixed cost = 100. Find the Cournot Nash equilibrium of this game. What quantity will each firm produce? what will be the market price? What would be the profits of each firm?
Solve for the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) in each of the following games. (a) The following two-by-two game is a little harder to solve since firm 2’spreferred strategy depends of what firm 1 does. But firm 1 has a dominantstrategy so this game has one Nash equilibrium. Firm 2 Launch Don’tFirm 1 Launch 60, -10 100, 0 Don’t 80, 30 120, 0 What is the Nash equilibrium of this simultaneous-move game? (b) What would the outcome of this game be if instead firm 1 moved first and then, after seeing what firm 1 chose, firm 2 chose it strategy? In this case firm 1 doesn’t necessarily need to choose a best response, but firm 2 must choose a best response since it moves second.
1. Two electricity firms compete in the same market and are deciding their level of advertising in order to increase customers and profits. The following matrix shows the profits (in millions) according to the strategy chosen: Firm 1 Strategies Low Advertising Aggressive Advertising Firm 2 Low Advertising 15, 15 20, -2 Aggressive Advertising -2, 20 5,5 a. Identify the one-shot Nash equilibrium. Comment. b. Suppose the players know this game will be repeated exactly 10 times. Can they achieve payoffs that are better than the one-shot Nash equilibrium? Explain. c. Suppose this game is infinitely repeated and the interest rate is 5%. Can the players achieve the collusive outcome? Explain.
Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high-tech industry. They facethe following payoff matrix as they decide upon the size of their research budget:a. Does Synergy have a dominant strategy? Explain.b. Does Dynaco have a dominant strategy? Explain.c. Is there a Nash equilibrium for this scenario? Explain. (Hint: Look closely at thedefinition of Nash equilibrium.)
Suppose that Green Giant and Red Rover are two companies competing in the canned vegetable market. Each is contemplating Green/Red Ad Campaign No Ad Campaign an aggressive new ad campaign. The payoffs of each decision are listed below, where Green Giant is player 1. Ad Campaign 1 million, 1 million |No Ad Campaign 3 million, zero 2 million, 2 million zero, 3 million Which of the following is true a. Neither Red Rover nor Green Giant has a dominant strategy b. Green Giants best repsone to Red Rover advertising is to not advertise c. Not advertising is the dominant strategy for both Red Rover and Green Giant d. Advertising is the dominant strategy for both Red Rover and Green Giant
The following is a static game: Convert this game into dynamic form game. Find the Nash equilibrium and subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of this game. If you consider this game as dynamic then what kind of dynamic game is this.
Little Kona is a small coffee company that is considering entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company's profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price: True or False: Only Little Kona has a dominant strategy in this game. True or False Which of the following outcomes represent a Nash equilibrium in this case? Check all that apply. Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona enters. a.Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona enters. b.Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona does not enter. c.Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona does not enter. Big Brew threatens Little Kona by saying, “If you enter, we're going to set a low price, so you had better stay out.” True or False: Little Kona should not believe the threat. True or False If the two firms could collude and agree on how to split the total profits, what outcome would they…