preview

10-Q Audit Paper

Decent Essays

After comparing the contents of these two documents, we can conclude that they provide different level of detail information. First, 10-K has a broad in scope than 10-Q. Second, 10-K is audited by the auditor that provided reasonable assurance, whereas 10-Q is just reviewed with limited assurance. Third, the users can get yearly data comparison and analysis in 10-K but quarterly data comparison in 10-Q.
There was no review report included with Pier 1 imports’ 3rd quarter 10-Q filing, so no one could provide assurance with respect to the accuracy of the information in the 10-Q. However, according to Sarbanes–Oxley Section 906, “each periodic report containing financial statements filed by an issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 78o (d)) shall be accompanied by a written statement by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer (or equivalent thereof) of the issuer”.(3) This provision indicates that the CEO and CFO must certify that the financial statements are fully complied with the requirements of the SEA and fairly presented in all material respects, …show more content…

But they have significant differences. First, the auditor provides reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement due to error or fraud in an audit report, but provides limited assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material modifications in a review report. A review engagement is substantially less intensive in scope than an audit, and just a few procedures are performed. (4) Second, review report is conducted according to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), while audit report is conducted according to the Standards of PCAOB. Moreover, review service is less cost than audit

Get Access