Ethical Issues In Business Law

-The Issue: were all the elements of a contract present to make the contract enforceable?

Gregory, a comedy writer, entered into a contract with Wessel, a comedian. The contract provided that Gregory would provide Wessel with a 15 minute monologue for his upcoming appearance on the comedy Hour and that Wessel would pay Gregory $250. All Performers on the comedy Hour make $500 per appearance. As Gregory knows, the last time Wessel appeared on the Comedy Hour he was asked to make special guest appearances at three local comedy clubs using the same monologue. Wessel earned a total of $750 for the three performances. Shortly before Wessel was scheduled to appear on the comedy Hour, Gregory informed Wessel that he was unable to provide the monologue. As a result, Wessel was forced to cancel his appearance. Wessel sued for breach of contract and requested damages of $1,250. What will result? Issue, -

1. What does Sue need to know about herself to determine how she will make decisions about providing care for indigent persons?

5. Why would my client murder her own husband if she had two kids with him and they loved him so much?

1. Fidelity Corporation offers to hire Ron to replace Monica, who has given Fidelity a month 's notice of intent to quit[11]. Fidelity gives Ron a week to decide whether to accept. Two days later, Monica signs an employment contract with Fidelity for another year. The next day, Monica tells Ron of the new contract. Ron immediately sends a formal letter of acceptance to Fidelity. Do Fidelity and Ron have a contract?

15. How should the company resolve a claim for assault, battery and false imprisonment arising out of an altercation with one of the company’s employees and how can the company protect itself against such claims in the future?

A. Uhrhahn Construction prepared proposals for work on construction projects for Lamar and Joan Hopkins. The Hopkinses signed the proposals for each project under sections titled “Acceptance of Proposal.” The proposals stated that any changes to the written estimates and specifications had to be in writing. During the construction, the Hopkinses made several oral requests for additional work not included in the proposals. They paid for some of them after receiving invoices labeled change orders for such work. When they did not pay for the rest, Uhrhahn sued, alleging there was an implied contract to make oral changes. Was there such an implied contract? Justify your position.

The first amendment was made for protection of speech and commercial speech. There are many entrepreneurs that are selling information and parts of the constitution will protect those businesses as they have liberty to economic freedom as well (Bonham, 2013). It is the right of those businesses or entrepreneurs and not the governments right to choose what occupation to pursue (Bonham, 2013). Some successful entrepreneurs are those that publish books, software, newsletters and websites (Three steps you must take to Ensure CFPB Compliance). BackOffice has entrepreneurs that are developing a software app and a service for that app.

The second part of the contract is referred to as consideration. Consideration is the term used to identify the entity or object that is being exchanged or bargained-for. The next element of a legally binding contract is called contractual capacity. Contractual capacity is defined as the legal ability of a person who is entering into a contract. For example, someone who is inebriated does not have the mental capacity to enter into a contract. And the final part of the contract is called a legal object. This means that the contract is legally bound. That means that no part of the contract can be illegal or against public policy. Therefore, given the above definition of a legal contract, all elements did not exist in the case of Peterson verses Simpson. First, the contract violates the agreement within a legal contract. The offer was made by Marshall Peterson but Fresh Fruit Inc. did not legally accept the contract. Fresh Fruits Inc. was not aware of its employee entering into the contract with Peterson nor did the employee have the legal authority to do so. If an agent has no authority to act on behalf of a principal but the agent still enters into a con- tract with a third party, the principal, regardless of the classification, is not bound to the contract unless the principal ratifies the agreement (Kippenhan, pg. 447). Not only was there no legal agreement, but there was a violation

1. If they reject the contract they will not have the potential to earn an additional $4

Your analysis of Janet’s case was extremely thoughtful and complete the first issue that I found imperative was when you mentioned her reason for saving her marriage was not to be pleased, however, her goal remained to stay married. This I believe is a key thought process in her thinking and illuminates the way she wants to be perceived. The other concern that you raise is her job. The fact that she went to school for interior design and is content on working for, another person while she supports her husband’s goals of owning his own pharmacy business is incredibly revealing her self-image. Janet’s inability to strive for additional success speaks to how she perceives her role as she supports Bill’s desire to be a business owner. This

There is clearly a contract here. The offer has been agreed and carried out for three continuing weeks without any problem. Consideration was given by the promisee. We are facing a standard-form contract. Here, there are two main claims.

This paper analyses the stated fact pattern against the matrix of contract law with a view to answering the two specific questions posed. The questions both concern issues of contract formation. Pertinent case law and authority is applied in de constructing the scenarios and forming sound conclusions.

the problem that has occurred here is that Abigail who is the acquiring purchasing manager for DNG Binto an assets organization located in Western Australia has long gone into an settlement with Peter who is a income representative for Caterpillar Inc. The Board of directors at DNG Binto had dispatched an inner observe expressing that they ought not to enter any agreements for the buy of improvement and extraction of hardware that passed $10 million with out the forums express endorsement. Whether or not DNG Binto is responsible for breach of agreement and is reasonable to pay Caterpillar Inc. for the machines as stipulated inside the agreement marked by means of Abigail relies upon on whether or not Abigail had the actual or apparent authority to go into a

Contracts Exam Question (with sample answers) Question 1 H. Bigbus (B hereafter) operates a construction supply business in Harrisburg. B specializes in supplying difficult-to-locate plumbing and light fixtures for contractors who do remodeling work. B sent the following letter to five contractors in the Harrisburg region: OFFER TO THE TRADE We have cornered the market for a source of brass "Orient Express" wall hanging light fixtures. We know (and we're sure that you do, too) that these fixtures are in such great demand that they are nearly impossible to obtain. If you are willing to take all your needs from us, we'll guarantee delivery at $20.00 each. I. M. Sap (S hereafter), a contractor who remodeled about twenty houses per year,