The nonprofit purchased Herzing University for $86 million from the Herzing family, effective January 1, 2015, and continues some leases of property from Herzing family members. According to a press report, a state official said that Herzing likely made the change to avoid new federal regulations and to gain access to state grant funding.24 In response to a request for comment, attorneys for Herzing University (the nonprofit) assert that the purchase price, to be paid over thirty years, and the leases are approved by independent board members at fair market values and that “rigorous conflict-of-interest rules are followed in all such instances.” After questions were raised about the transaction by this author and by members of Congress, the …show more content…
Everglades responded. The IRS requested more information including the Keiser purchase agreement, the management agreement between Everglades Management (previously disclosed as owned in part by Keiser) and the college, any loan agreements, and an explanation of the connections to Keiser College, Keiser Career Institute, and Keiser Management Inc., Susan Ziegelhofer, the president of Everglades College, Inc., responded that there was no purchase agreement: the transfer of the college “was a charitable contribution of the entire educational facility.” She further declares that there are no loans between the for-profit and tax-exempt entities. In response, the IRS requested that Everglades provide the following information regarding loans or payments to Keiser-controlled entities: For each of the following please explain and specify the accounts: a. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses please provide a detail [sic] explanation why there is a $50,951.18 debit balance in this account? b. If you have no loan or note agreements who is the loan with and what is the relationship for the Loan Payable of $16,208.41 and please explain the terms and conditions of the …show more content…
Rul. 76-441, 1976-2 C.B. 147, presents two situations concerning school operations. In the first scenario a nonprofit school succeeded to the assets of a for-profit school. While the former owners were employed in the new school, the board of directors was completely different. The ruling concludes that the transfer did not serve a private interest. Part of that conclusion was based on the independence of the board. In the second scenario, the for-profit school converted to a nonprofit school. The former owners became the new school’s directors. The former owners/new directors benefited financially from the conversion. The ruling concludes that private interest was served. The conclusion is stated as follows: “The directors were, in fact, dealing with themselves and will benefit financially from the transactions. Therefore, (the applicant) is not operated exclusively for educational and charitable purpose and does not quality for exemption from federal income tax under Section 501 (c) (3) of the
a. According to the bank statement, how many checks were written from this account during the statement period? (0.5 points)
a. According to the bank statement, how many checks were written from this account during the statement period? (0.5 points)
(d) $1 billion 10 year debenture @ 7.5% with 18.18 warrants at $ 55 exercisable until 1988.
Reasoning: The court referenced Matter of Goldstein, in this matter the court reaffirmed the long-standing doctrine that the role of the Judiciary is limited in reviewing findings of blight in eminent domain proceedings. They court found that expansion of private university could qualify as a civic purpose and that the UDC actually encourages in projects by private entities. They concluded that the Project’s purpose was to promote education and academic research while providing public benefits to the local
College Access Foundation of California (CAFC) is based in California State and the non-profit foundation came into being in 2005 after the sales of student loan company Chela Education Financing, Inc. The endowment fund of College Access Foundation of California is approximately $400 million. College Access Foundation of California was established to provide the low-income and underrepresented populations of current and prospective students to seek higher education. The foundation is currently progressively engaged in California State to provide educational funds for deserving students.
F) If Photolab Ltd become insolvent because of the loan provided to Photoproductions Ltd, what liability, if any, have the directors for the company’s debts? Who can bring the action and what remedies are available? (7+5=12 marks)
a. According to the bank statement, how many checks were written from this account during the statement period? (0.5 points)
b. What is the total balance of Jessie Robinson 's revolving account? (0.5 points) N/A
1.3 Before going to the next account, let’s analyze the Accounts Payable account closer. This account is special. Look at the Control data tab
That's a great question. Please allow me a moment to review your loan file. Thank you for your patience.
6. You want to purchase a truck for $25,000 and you have $3,450 to put down. How much will your payments be if you financed the truck for 60 months at 6%?
Question 3: Describe and show the journal entries illustrating how the company accounts for the transfer of its accounts receivable to financial institutions. Is this accounting treatment reasonable? What are the key assumptions made under this approach? Do you agree with these assumptions?
31, 2004) was computed, then the total Accounts Receivable balance would be $4,578,008.14. This indicates
b. Trace the line item “Balance per Bank Statement” – Accuracy and Existence (AU-C 315.A114 a-iii, b-i)