preview

Intraepithelial Carcinomatic Tissue Case Study

Good Essays

A review of the records reveals the member to be an adult female with a birth date of 11/12/1947. The member has a diagnosis of endometrial cancer and serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC). The member’s treating provider, William Cliby, MD recommended the member have a positron emission tomography (PET) scan performed.

The carrier has denied coverage of the PET scan as not medically necessary. There is a letter from the carrier to the member dated 02012016, which states in part:

“After carefully reviewing the medical information, I am upholding the original decision to deny the above stated service(s). The denial is based on the Plan’s provisions. Based on the medical information, the criteria for approval were not met.”

There is a letter from William Cliby, MD dated 02/15/2016, which states in part, “However, after her initial surgery, which was done in a minimally invasive manner, her final pathology showed an occult …show more content…

The member in question was diagnosed with a primary cancer for which she underwent a surgical procedure. While reviewing the pathologic review of the tissue from her surgery, a second primary cancer is identified which may act in a more aggressive fashion than the original malignancy. Therefore, this case be should be consider in a unique way and standard protocols may not be applicable.

In order to properly stage the member for the second unexpected malignancy found after surgery, two viable options for staging existed. The first option, surgical staging, would mean a significant risk and increased morbidity for the member. The second option, a PET-CT scan, would be less costly and would be less morbid for the member. Therefore, the PET-CT scan was performed after careful deliberation at the facility in question and after consultation with outside cancer specialists. Thankfully, the PET-CT scan did not show evidence of residual

Get Access