Ecotype organization: a bureaucracy innovation of group companies
Introduction
In the current world 's development pattern of global integration, more and more group companies emerged. They all have some systematic enterprise architectures to operate their groups. The one I had been worked, LeEco Group Ltd., is a unique case with their organization structure. Unlike the other traditional state-owned enterprises, LeEco Group is an innovative Internet group company. In my view, to a great extent, LeEco Group has some innovations in their management style based on the classic bureaucracy management theory proposed by Weber (1948).
Different scholars give definitions of bureaucracy. In the book “Managing&Oranizations” written by Clegg (2008,P.486), the concept of bureaucracy is summarized as “an organizational form consisting of a hierarchy of differentiated knowledge and expertise in which rules and disciplines are arranged not only hierarchically in regard to each other but also in parallel”. Weber (1948), who has significant influence on the formation of bureaucracy concept, considered that the formation, control and domination of any organization should be constructed from specific authority. However, LeEco Group is different.
When talking about the business form of an enterprise, we usually pay close attention to its organizational structure. The group that I worked, LeEco Group, is composed of multi-business lines of subsidiaries. These subsidiaries take shape as a
A bureaucracy is a way of administratively organizing large numbers of people who need to work
The organizational forms a company might have as it evolves from a start-up to a major corporation are proprietorship, partnership, or corporation.
Within any business there are the organizational functions that can create the type of structure an organization will have. A business's functions are the things it does. Production, sales, and marketing are a few examples Chick-fil-A has within the company. The organizational structure defines the relationship and interactions between the different parts of the company, and identifies how the chain of command runs through the different levels. When money is earned at a fast pace, it opens doors for the company to expand. As the company grows, they begin to hire more employees and they offer new products.
When firms enter new markets or businesses, the way they structure these new businesses can result in greater complexity and less transparency. For instance, a firm that keeps each business separate will be easier to value than one that squeezes all the businesses into a single entity.
If group is deemed a reference group, consider how this group affects or hasaffected your lifepersonally and/or professionally? If you select any organizations for youranalysis, consider Weber’s five characteristics of an ideal bureaucracy and suggest which (if any) of the characteristics are directly applicable to your organization. From personal experience, examine the positive and negative ramifications of operating within a bureaucratic structure.
What is a bureaucracy? Tolbert and Hall (2009) describe in the text, a large formal organization with the characteristics of having, a division of labor, a hierarchy of authority, a set of written rules, resources that are clearly separated from home and the organization, and group of members who are appointed according to qualifications (P. 22). These were the key elements Max Weber, a German scholar described for an ideal type of bureaucracy.
The term bureaucracy was coined by a well-known sociologist named Max Weber in 1947. He used this term to describe corporations that held five main characteristics. These characteristics include, hierarchical authority structure, a division of labor, written rules, written communications and records, and impersonality and replaceability. In the modern day world, it is easy to see several bureaucracies in place, however, one bureaucracy that is personally close to all Grand Canyon University students is the institution of Grand Canyon University (GCU). This is a great example of a bureaucracy due to the fact that it embraces all five characteristics of a bureaucracy.
A simpler way to think of what is a bureaucracy is to think of what is a bureaucrat: a bureaucrat is any person in a secondary or tertiary function within an organization. For example, in an architectural firm, you have principal architects, staff architects, intern architects, accountants, and administrators (I am ignoring the CA and PM functions for this example). All of the architects primarily do design work, that is the function of the firm. The principals also do some marketing, which is really a secondary function, so they are part bureaucrat and part functionary. The
Bureaucracy is ahierarchical organization which follows strict rules and regulations in achieving desired goals and which has tendency to gain supremacy over other organizations. Famous German sociologist theorized ideal- type of bureaucracy. Max Weber thought bureaucracy is the highest efficient organization which falls under legal rational authority. Soon after the theory came out, like other theory, ideal-type bureaucracy theory encountered severe criticisms.Alvin Gouldner, Robert Merton, Phillip Selznick, Peter Blau are some of them who criticized the ideal-type of bureaucracy.
Weber states that organizations regulations are formed by few people and this people are the boss, administration employee who tends to have representation powers (Roth and Wittich, 1968). Weber states that the state tends to use bureaucracy on its people in order to establish authority. Bureaucracy is present in various areas in the environment and once bureaucracy is produced then it becomes difficult to
After reading the article Social Organizations by Robert Prodanciuc, it has become clear that within the term organization in regards to the workplace, there are many different facets to what an organization actually is, and what influences its overall development and consistency. When examining the various styles, one that is mentioned by the author when citing Ioan Mihăilescu stands out as the type of organization I see myself involved in when thinking of the future: bureaucracy. The author defines a bureaucracy as a "type of social organization where power is exercised by an administrative department that is more or less rational. The elements of the ideal type of bureaucracy are: the prescriptions system, the rationality of goals pursuing,
Based on this right, the bureaucracy designed by Weber has clear division of labor; thoroughly indicated hierarchical relationship and pointed out impersonal relationship (Crozier, 1964). In the course of history, there have been various more perfect organizational systems, therefore, bureaucratic theory was questioned and criticized by many scholar. However, there are still certain organizations that use bureaucracy theory to design the corporate structure despite many critical views.
Sole traders have unlimited liabilities,meaning that in terms of law there is no separation between them,hence the sole trader is also liable for the debts incurred within the business, which makes it very risky to run for a long-term.
The structure of an organisation is built in order to achieve the distinct tasks by the labour and coordination between teams to provide goods and services. Organisational structure is selected in order to have a basic work and consistency according to the situation. The most foremost factors in an organisation are skilled labours, mutual understanding among the fellows and direct control to frame a good result. A good structured organisation results in quality production, which can be taken into peoples consider through marketing. When an organisation tracks in a solid structure, management plans and tasks can be easily constructed and executed. In this essay, I have been explained about the concept of Mintzberg five
The word Bureau means office and Kracy means usage. So, bureaucracy refers to a form of social organization which is managed by strict rules and regulation and which has a goal of achieving technical superiority over any social organization. But