Essay on Shady Trail Case Study

states having legalised it. The main similarities between the past of Native Indians and the LGBT people is pegged on the persecution that this people underwent. The Native Indians were persecuted by the Whites while the LGBT people were persecuted by the people who felt that gaysim was evil earlier on (Haider,2016). The differences between the past and the present of the Native Indians and LGBT groups is pegged on the persecution agents. The

The key issue faced by general manager Shelby Givens of Westlake Lanes is whether or not to maintain the current practices of the business or seek new alternatives. She must convince the board that within her allotted one year, progress has been made in improving the business and ultimately convince them that profitability is in the foreseeable future and that their personal debt will be repaid.

Cruickshank, Garth& Romano is a startup company, formed by Richard, Chris and Wayne to provide industrial, residential and commercial evaluations, and also consulting services and feasibility analyses in National Capital Region (NCR). Based on the experienced principals who enjoy good reputations, Cruickshank, Garth& Romano is aimed at providing high quality service as NCR’s top four firms which dominate the commercial appraisal market in NCR, but they tend to do business with the owners of smaller properties. Recently, because of the economic regression, to get sufficient revenue, the principals have realized that getting new larger developers is crucial to

Investors have a number of development options in this community. Since it has remained primarily residential for years, there are many different vacant lots developed. The community's real estate prices are rising, so investors have the option of just buying the lot and leaving it vacant until they sell it.

The property, according to Alexander, was aesthetically desirable and had profit potential; additionally the asking price of $350,000 was within his price range. Some renovation on the property was needed and the cost approximates $165,000 according to a contractor. After preparing an income and expense statement, Alexander projected a cash flow before financing of $61,510, without any allowance for the work he would do himself. He also planned to live in the top floor apartment with his wife “rent free”, while making money by managing and renting. With time of the essence, he had to act fast and take the property off the market before a potential investor got ahead of him.

Table 7 in the detailed analysis above shows the summary of the Discounted Cash Flow analysis performed for each of the four potential properties considered for investment. From the chart below, we observe that of the four properties, TFB has the maximum increase in reversion value at the end of the holding period, i.e. 10years. On a primarily income generation potential basis, Alison Green, with a Net Present value of the future rents at $734.29 looks attractive among the four options. Looking at the Investment ranks of the four properties with Simple returns and Discounted returns variables, Alison

Angus Cartwright III, an investment advisor, was asked to provide investment advisory services for two clients, John DeRight and Judy DeRight. They both wanted to purchase a property that (1) is large enough to attract the interest of a professional real estate management company and (2) has a minimum leveraged return on their investments of 12% after

The current assessed value of the property is stated at $400,000, however with the improvements to be made by the current owner, there is a projected value of $500,000. However, with Mr. Alexander making the improvements to the property himself, along with the average rents in the area increasing, the value is now projected to be worth $562,500 a 12.5% increase.

After analysis of Mr. Alexander’s proposal, it is obvious why he should take advantage of a real estate investment opportunity. The experience he would gain coupled with the added income would establish a solid foundation for making more investments in the future. To this end, however, I find Alexander’s plan for the Revere Street property falls short. A major deficiency is that his projections are almost entirely predicated on estimates and assumptions that are neither conservative nor reliable. In a similar vein, Alexander’s “DIY” approach is not only exemplar of naiveté, but also suggestive of many implications that were overlooked in his proposal. And, even more discouraging, a best-case scenario analysis reveals that even without

The total current Assessed value is $850,000. During this time, Denver is on a growing trend and projected to continue. In the local area, new housing, new neighborhoods, new malls, and even schools are under way or in the planning stages. The Grande property is large and there are plenty of expansion options. The Grande’s have not come up with an asking price, but the local banks have offered to provide a 15-year note for a max of $624,000.

Given certain indicators of slow market growth and the high purchase price being advertised by the seller, this is most likely a bad investment for Laflin and his investors. While employment growth may be on the rise, the lack of speculative construction is troubling as this implies the market is not expecting an increased demand. In any case, when considering the expiration of the current tenants’ above market rents and the unfortunately low current market rents, Laflin would still need a great deal of growth in addition to a lower negotiated price to make this investment profitable.

The real estate division was estimated to have a fair value of $13,890,000. This was determined by totaling the number of lots expected to sell within the next four years and multiplying it by the price per lot of $180,000. After determining total lot sales, a 20% discount rate was applied as suggested by current market conditions. Given the unique nature of the real estate development, it is not believed that there are any comparable developments to find a market multiple.

The second appraisal had the extraordinary assumption that the property would be leased to Tesla Motors at $23 per square foot. Based on the assumption that all 25 thousand square feet would be leased at that rate, the appraisers reported that the market value was $8,510,000, over three million more than what they said it was three months prior.

Changes to the rent roll and vacancy rate as well as the addition of debt cost in the mode yield an npv of $553k. When the initial investment of $400k is taken into consideration this yields a total npv of $153k. This is a positive NPV and therefore the investment is not a losing proposition. However this should be compared to other investments.

When we look at 75% occupancy, the rate of return (net earnings divided by amount invested) is $298,000/$3,525,000 = 8.4%. . This return should be regarded as low; as the