Should Genetically Modified Foods Be Labeled?

There are varied arguments that favor or are against compulsory labeling of genetically engineered food products. Those who argue for the labeling of such products argue that consumers have a right to know what is contained in their food, particularly food products for which there have been health and environmental concerns (Caswell 26). Compulsory labeling will permit consumers to identify and avoid those food products that may cause them problems. On the contrary, those who argue against mandatory labeling point out that

The debate over genetically modified foods continues to haunt producers and consumers alike. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are foods that have been modified through bioengineering to possess certain characteristics. These plants have been modified in the laboratory to enhance traits such as increased resistance to herbicides or increased nutritional content (Whitman, 2000). The debate continues to grow as to whether these genetically altered foodstuffs are the answer to hunger in the coming years, or whether we are simply children playing with something that we do not have the capacity to understand. One of the biggest debates in the GMO issue is whether producers need to use labeling of

The advancement of technology has allowed our generation to genetically modify food for what is believed to be beneficial to consumers. The environmental and health effects of genetically modified foods have generated controversy about whether these foods are safe. With such advances, the use of genetically modified food is expanding, even though they 're unlabeled. Genetically modified foods should be labeled because of the possible health, environmental, and economic risks. Once a consumer knows what they are paying for, it is fair to produce and market such foods.

Ever since their entrance onto the consumer market in the last two decades of the twentieth century, genetically modified organisms (often referred to as GMOs) have been getting mixed reviews from the public. Genetically modified consumer products (primarily food) have pushed the barriers of some people's comfort levels. Born out of either a lack of knowledge or a sincere concern for public health or the environment, a consumer rights movement has been planted around the world pushing for labeling of genetically modified food products. This movement has matured in many places to a degree where interest groups have successfully lobbied governments into adopting criteria for labeling transgenic food

Off and on over the years, I have heard about GMO’s from time to time. GMO’s are genetically modified Organisms. Which basically means that they have been changed by means of science to be resistant to bugs or other issues that crops face. In the American food supply GMO’s are quite common, we don’t even know if we are eating them. As of right now “70 to 80 percent of processed food that Americans consume contain plants that have been genetically engineered” (source 2). This being the case there are a number of ethical concerns raised by this. A couple examples are whether or not they will cause disease or allergies in humans through ingestion or by other means, whether or not they are environmentally safe, and if they should be labeled so that we know that we are eating them. I myself have no issue with GMO’s one way or the other, though I can understand people’s

This article is about the Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) labeling law that President Obama signed, the law allows companies to label their products in anyway they want to indicate the presence of GMO products. This article discusses the controversy between both sides of the GMO labeling debate, the pro labeling side desiring to know what they are consuming and the against labeling side expressing their fear that the label of GMO on a product would make consumers turn away unnecessarily. This law was a compromise to both sides as it requires a form of labeling that makes it possible for inquiring consumers to find what is in their food but also does not require companies to clearly state the presence of GMO.

Genetically Modified Organisms are organisms in which the genetic material or DNA has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally. This is done in order to get traits such as longer shelf life and pesticide resistance. They were developed because the perceived advantage is meant to translate into a product with a lower price, greater benefit, such as the durability and the nutritional value, or both. GMOs have not been proven to be safe as of yet. The long-term consequences of them on our health and environment have not been adequately investigated. There is a contentious debate today whether or not GMO labelling should be mandatory. There are arguments both for and against mandatory labelling across the world. Consumers have the right to know what is in their food. They should also be able to identify foods they wish to steer clear of. Some may also want to steer clear of GM foods for ethical or religious reasons. Consumers may be against mandatory labelling because those who wish to buy foods without GMOs already have the option to purchase them; organic of GMO-free. There is also debate stating if there were a nutritional difference or allergic characteristic in the GM foods, it would have to be labelled no matter what.

Not only is this practice dangerous to the customer, it could also cause damage to businesses affected.

My first reason that GMO foods should be labeled is because, ”In 2013, the journal ‘Food and Chemical Toxicology’... linked the herbicide Roundup and Roundup-tolerant GM corn to cancer and premature death in rats.”(GMOs: Pros and Cons) If rats get sick from eating GMO foods, then imagine what it could be slowly doing to our bodies. We, as consumers, have the right to know exactly what we are eating and how that is affecting our bodies.

The labeling of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is an extremely delicate issue. The way the law deals with this heated argument is extremely important for future research and public acceptance. I will argue that the benefits of the biotechnology that deals with GMOs outweigh the risks, and that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should continue to regulate GMOs under the current system which does not require special labeling if the food is “substantially equivalent.”(FDA)

It was only the beginning of the late 20th century, when research and development on genetic modification and genetic engineering began. However, over the past couple of decades, genetic modification has grown to become an important controversial issue in our society. Its consequences can be devastating, but if used correctly, could help shape the world into a different place. However, even at this moment, people still question its integrity and proper use. Along with genetic engineering, the choice to regulate mandatory laws for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is disputed. The question concerns whether the government should require labels on all genetically modified foods or let the food companies decide. Our choices on the matter

Ever wondered what has been put into everyday food and what the impact is on human health? Approximately 60-80 % of everyday food has one ingredient made from genetically modified foods. When hearing “genetically modified food” people automatically think it is only bad for health, but there is also a good impact surprisingly. The one bad thing is that people do not know what types food have been modified because there are no labels for GMO products. Even though GMOs have a bad impact on human health, it also has a good impact.

Genetically Modified Organisms, also known as GMOs, is one of the major issues arising in our economy today. GMOs are distinctive organisms in which the genetic material has been altered to improve productivity and the quality of the product. Genetically modified organisms have prominent concerns over their apparent beneficial ways in that they’re resistant to disease, help the epidemic of famine, and improve the nutritional value of foods. Having certain foods in your everyday diet is very substantial in humans to be healthy, and to have the quality of life we deserve. It’s no secret in how GMOs have affected our products worldly. In order to bring this epidemic to a halt we fist have to come to an understanding on how dangerous these organisms can be. Genetically altered crops can lead to serious destruction of not only our environment, but also contaminate our organic crops. Also major companies who work with GMOs intend to monopolize market-foods. To prevent these Genetically Modified organisms, it should be labeled on their products, and so then people can be aware of the danger that comes with these products.

Large, private food companies rave about the benefits of genetically modified foods. Apparently, they will end world hunger, reduce pesticide use, and move developing countries towards sustainable development. What they do not discuss, however, is the other side of the argument. With this increased food supply comes serious health risks, biological pollution, and economic crises. What good is a storehouse full of genetically modified food if the population it was meant to feed has been killed off due to its side effects? While they may benefit large corporations or farmers, genetically modified foods are unsafe for the human population, and they should be labeled in order to raise awareness about the negative consequences for the world and its environment.

Started from 1996, genetically modified organisms was introduced and has been a prevalence in America. People used the bio-engineering technology to grow crops and create DNA-Altered livestock in order to get better foods for humans. Nowadays, we could see genetically modified organisms exist in nearly 70% crop in U.S., it has take place of the non-bioengineered food at homes and restaurants. In the process of using genetically modified foods, lots of people are doubting the safety of genetically modified foods. And they think Government should require company label genetically modified foods on the cover of their production. However, many scientists believe genetically modified foods is same as the normal food, it does not need to be labeled. Should genetically modified foods be labeled? We need genetically modified foods labeling because we have the right to know what is in our food in order to get safe and health for ourselves and families.