5.2.2.1.4 Accounts Receivable Turnover
Net Sales Accounts Receivables Accounts Receivable Turnover
TATA 36,294.74 1,114.48 32.6
MAHINDRA 38,945.42 2,558.03 15.2
5.2.2.1.5 Collection Period
Period (Days) Accounts Receivable Turnover Collection Period (Days)
TATA 365 32.57 11
MAHINDRA 365 15.22 24
5.2.2.1.6 Inventory Turnover
Cost of Sales Inventory Inventory Turnover
TATA 25,922.90 4,802.08 5.4
MAHINDRA 27,854.49 2,437.57 11.4
5.2.2.1.7 Conversion Period
Period Inventory Turnover Conversion Period
TATA 365.00 5.40 67.6
MAHINDRA 365.00 11.43 31.9
5.2.2.2 Long Term
5.2.2.2.1 Total Debt to Total Capital
Total Debt Total Capital Total Debt to Total Capital
TATA 20,080.97 27,181.55 0.74
MAHINDRA 2,620.38 21,769.22 0.12
5.2.2.2.2 Long Term Debt
…show more content…
But the real reflection of the performance of the management lies in the Operating profit margin (OPM) and in this case M&M has done fairly well and their OPM for FY2014-15 is similar to their last years OPM. Whereas Tata Motors has increased their non-operating expense by spending to the tune of 4K crore on R&D (for Jaguar and Land Rover) and has hence garnered losses for FY 2014-15 (OPM: TM -5.4% M&M 10.4%). Although
Comment: The operating profit margin is lower than the gross profit margin due to its high usage of expenses, but 19% is also not a good nor bad indicator of how well the company is going it should be compared to other companies.
A person can see from the analysis that both companies had a fewer profits in 2005 over 2004. The increase of operation expenses was the cause of low net profits. Both companies need to rethink their operating cost to decrease their expenses which in return can help increase their profit margin.
Calculate the ROA to find out how much profit was generated from the assets (Table 5). The existence of unnecessary wasted assets can become an obstacle to the execution of strategy. Conversely, if they can utilize assets without waste, it will be possible to carry out the strategy with less cost. In the total assets, which calculated the management resources by the amount, it is possible to know the profitability and the efficiency on a companywide basis. Figure 6 shows the trend of ROA for five years at Toyota's FY 2011 to 2015. Regarding FY 2011 to 13, it can consider a substantial recovery in net income and an increase in total assets due to an increase in notes receivable. Meanwhile, after FY 2014, the profit margin growth
DMC needs to identify their main business problems and develop a new strategy along with procedures to address it. Although DMC had grown into a multi-billion dollar company and regularly ranks in the top of the industry, gross margins have decreased steadily between 2010 and 2012. Depicted the Table 1 below, margins ranged from a net income loss of $2.6 billion in 2010, $1.7 billion in 2011, down to just $940 million.
The 5 year average for Operating Margins is 15.61% over the industry average of (-2.22%). I would once again reference that the operating margins are high because of HD’s foot hold in their industry which is also echoed in their Net Profit margin ratio of 7.86% over the industry comparison of (-0.48%). Comparisons for Pre-Tax Margin Ratios are 12.5% to the industries (-0.46%). This is a good indication
In general there are 10 ratios that govern the finances of an organization. But, we have been given only three ratios though all the ratios are essential because they acquire nearly 90 percent of the information contained in the financial statements. These can be any but we have to choose the best three that certainly makes the difference. The major three ratios would be the operating margin, it is an essential ratio that deals with the organization’s profitability
Therefore, due to these differences in approach of the management, the profitability margins are so different for these two companies.
Accounts receivable, or A/R, represent the cash due to a provider, or physician in this case, by insurance carriers or the insured patient. To reduce, or decrease, the total balance due, the payments are applied, or added, to the patients account. In other words, accounts receivable is cash that is owed to a company or practice by its debtors. Payments due from guarantors, patients, or payers is known to be accounts receivable. Getting paid in a manner that is timely and correct is something every practice wishes to achieve. They must do that by managing their accounts receivable. They also measure accounts receivable, or A/R, in days. To do this, you must calculate by dividing the total accounts receivable by the average charges daily for the practice. For example, "60 days in A/R" means that the practice is due payment for the equivalent of 60 days of work. Some practices handle these accounts receivable by:
that the company's cost management and pricing strategy is weakening. The decreasing operating profit margin
The Rate of Earnings has increased from the previous year. The company is in growing stage and the cost of machinery is huge that’s why the profit margin is low.
Operating costs as a function of sales have seen an increase year over year with quite a bit of absolute percentage volatility. These costs alone accounting for 105%, 124%, and 108% of total revenues for 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively. If these were primarily variable costs, then with the reduction in total revenues these should have decreased as well somewhat proportionately. With production, distribution, and editorial costs comprising over 50% as a function of sales, MSLO is not controlling key product & distribution costs in a manner that will help increase their profit margins and possibly take them back to profitability. Because of this, the entities ability to continue as a going concern is questionable. With three years of massive losses and an accumulated deficit reaching almost $200 million, MSLO benefits from having an equity multiplier of ~1.46. The lack of liquidity issues ensures that MSLO can continue operating a net loss for a while longer. The flat growth/decay in general and administrative expenses indicates the firm is maintaining the same level of salary for a contracting business.
Rolls-Royce has been generating higher margins in past few years. In last four years i.e. from 2002 to 2006 the operating profit has grown from £168 million to £692 million with the annual growth rate of 42.5%. The net profit has also increased at compound annual growth rate of 71.3% from £53 million to £998 million in these four years. These figures are the indicators of a strong financial performance. It is evident from the figures that the high levels of margin in their field of operation are very
During the period 2012 and 2013, the Operating profit margin decreased from 9.2% to 5.7%. This slight decline can be attributed to the decreased revenues and the increase in tax expenses.
Operating profit margin figures in the table above show the return from net sales[13]. However profit margin ratios are high enough for the 3 years, there is a fall from 12.86% to 11.26% during 2011-12. Sales revenue increases with a higher rate than gross profit so there is a poor