Fundamentals Of Financial Management, Concise Edition (mindtap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337902571
Author: Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 11, Problem 9P
a.
Summary Introduction
To calculate: The NPV and IRR of the given project with and without mitigation.
Introduction:
Capital Budgeting:
It refers to the long term investment decisions that has been taken by the top management of a company and that are irreversible in nature. These decisions require investment of large amount of the company’s cash.
It is a method under capital budgeting which includes the calculation of net present value of the project in which the company is investing. The calculation is done by calculating the difference between the value of
It refers to the rate of return that is computed by the company to make a decision regarding the selection of a project for investment. This rate provides the basis for selection of projects with lower cost of capital and rejection of project with higher cost of capital.
b.
Summary Introduction
To identify: The way in which the environmental effects should be dealt with when this project is evaluated.
c.
Summary Introduction
To explain: Whether the project should be undertaken or not with or without mitigation.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal, but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would cost $240 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $80 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $84 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk-adjusted WACC is 17%.
a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with and without mitigation.
b. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project?
c. Should this project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do the mitigation? Why or why not?
An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some alr
pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $210.55 million, and the expected cash
Inflows would be $70 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does Invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $75.20 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The
risk adjusted WACC is 19%.
a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not…
An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air
pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $240.20 million, and the expected cash
Inflows would be $80 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $84.06 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk
adjusted WACC is 19%.
a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not…
Chapter 11 Solutions
Fundamentals Of Financial Management, Concise Edition (mindtap Course List)
Ch. 11 - How are project classifications used in the...Ch. 11 - Prob. 2QCh. 11 - Why is the NFV of a relatively long-term project...Ch. 11 - Prob. 4QCh. 11 - If two mutually exclusive projects were being...Ch. 11 - Discuss the following statement: If a firm has...Ch. 11 - Prob. 7QCh. 11 - Project X is very risky and has an NPV of 3...Ch. 11 - Prob. 9QCh. 11 - A firm has a 100 million capital budget. It is...
Ch. 11 - NPV Project L costs 65,000, its expected cash...Ch. 11 - IRR Refer to problem 11-1. What is the projects...Ch. 11 - MIRR Refer to problem 11-1. What is the projects...Ch. 11 - PAYBACK PERIOD Refer to problem 11-1. What is the...Ch. 11 - Prob. 5PCh. 11 - NPV Your division is considering two projects with...Ch. 11 - CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA A firm with a 14% WACC...Ch. 11 - CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS...Ch. 11 - Prob. 9PCh. 11 - CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA: MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE...Ch. 11 - CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA: MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE...Ch. 11 - Prob. 12PCh. 11 - MIRR A firm is considering two mutually exclusive...Ch. 11 - CHOOSING MANDATORY PROJECTS ON THE BASIS OF LEAST...Ch. 11 - Prob. 15PCh. 11 - Prob. 16PCh. 11 - CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA A company has an 11%...Ch. 11 - Prob. 18PCh. 11 - Prob. 19PCh. 11 - Prob. 20PCh. 11 - Prob. 21PCh. 11 - Prob. 22PCh. 11 - CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA Your division is...Ch. 11 - BASICS OF CAPITAL BUDGETING You recently went to...
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $240.31 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $80 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $84.22 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk adjusted WACC is 19%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not…arrow_forwardAn electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $240.20 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $80 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does Invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $84.06 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk adjusted WACC is 19%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not…arrow_forwardAn electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $209.80 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $70 million p year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $75.55 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk adjusted WACC is 17%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, in any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not…arrow_forward
- An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $269.87 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $90 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $93.62 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk adjusted WACC is 16%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not…arrow_forwardAn electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $269.75 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $90 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $93.85 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk adjusted WACC is 17%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not…arrow_forwardA LOINE CONS company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjustedd weighted average cost of capital(WACC) is 12%. Calculate the Net present value and internal rate of return with and without mitigation. Shouldd the project be undertaken? If so,, should the firm do mitigation?arrow_forward
- New York City is evaluating the construction of a new train station to serve a new high-speed rail system. The Capital Projects Team is responsible for evaluating whether the project is economically acceptable. The Capital Projects Team estimates that the new train station will generate $1B in annual revenue, and provide $1B a year in cost savings. The new train line will cannibalize some of the existing revenues the City receives from its current train system. The value of this cannibalization is estimated at $500 MM a year. The new station's costs of Maintenance and Operation are anticipated to amount to be $250 MM per year. The initial investment required to design and build the train station is expected to be $15 B. New York City is considered to be a high credit and can borrow long-term in the capital markets at a rate of 6%. The Capital Projects Team evaluates these types of projects over a study period of 25 years. What is the Modified B/C Ratio? .94 1.00 1.07 1.10arrow_forwardA Builder company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted weighted average cost of capital is 12%. Calculate the Net Present Value and IRR with and without mitigation. Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation?arrow_forwardA BoxerLoi33 company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 12%. Calculate the IRR and NPV with and without mitigation. 2.Using Picture formula can the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation?arrow_forward
- A construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 12%. Calulate the Payback with and without mitgationwhat is the discounted payback with and without mitigation?Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation? (hint: discuss all the criterias you have calculated in earlier parts)How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluatedarrow_forwardA construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 12%. Calculate the NPV with and without mitigation. Show the workingsarrow_forwardA proposed steel mill may include a co-generation electrical plant. This plant will add $2.3M in first cost with net annual savings of $0.27M considering operating costs and electrical bills. The plant will have a $0.4M salvage value after 25 years. The firm uses an interest rate of 12% and present worth index (PWI) in its decision making. The public utility offers a subsidy for co-generation facilities because it will not have to invest as much in new capacity. This subsidy is calculated as 20% of the co-generation facility’s first cost, but it is paid annually. The utility calculates the subsidy using a benefit–cost ratio at 8% and a life of 20 years. (a) Is the plant economically justifiable to the firm without the subsidy? What is the PWI? (b) What is the annual subsidy? (c) Is the plant economically justifiable to the firm with the subsidy? Now what is the PWI? (d) How important is the difference in interest rates, and how does it affect these results? (e) How important is the…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage Learning
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning
EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Finance
ISBN:9781337514835
Author:MOYER
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...
Finance
ISBN:9781337395083
Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305970663
Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:Cengage Learning