Microeconomics (13th Edition)
13th Edition
ISBN: 9780134744476
Author: Michael Parkin
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 15.3, Problem 1RQ
To determine
The punishment strategies if a prisoners’ dilemma game is played repeatedly.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
What is the Nash Equilibrium in a game?A. A situation where all players cooperate for maximum gainB. A situation where no player can improve their outcome by changing their strategy unilaterallyC. A situation where players always choose the same strategyD. A situation where players randomly select strategies
Using game theory what are some examples in where Nash equilibrium is incorporated?
Please answer all parts.
Two construction companies EdilA and EdilB take part in a race contract to build a school. Both can bid 1000, 2000 or 3000. The winner (the lowest offer) builds the school and pays 900 of costs.
1. When both bid the same amount, EdilA wins the contract. Find the Nash equilibrium.
2. Assume instead that when both bid the same, neither gets the contract, and furthermore suffer a penalty of 10. Find the Nash equilibrium.
3. Assume instead that when both bid the same, each builds half the school (but sustains 600 of costs, thus more than half). Find the Nash equilibrium.
4. Under the hypothesis of point 2 assume that EdilB can observe the offer made by EdilA before it makes its offer, and that EdilA anticipates that. Find the Nash equilibrium by backward induction of this sequential game.
Chapter 15 Solutions
Microeconomics (13th Edition)
Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 1RQCh. 15.1 - Prob. 2RQCh. 15.1 - Prob. 3RQCh. 15.1 - Prob. 4RQCh. 15.2 - Prob. 1RQCh. 15.2 - Prob. 2RQCh. 15.2 - Prob. 3RQCh. 15.2 - Prob. 4RQCh. 15.2 - Prob. 5RQCh. 15.2 - Prob. 6RQ
Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 1RQCh. 15.3 - Prob. 2RQCh. 15.4 - Prob. 1RQCh. 15.4 - Prob. 2RQCh. 15.4 - Prob. 3RQCh. 15.4 - Prob. 4RQCh. 15.4 - Prob. 5RQCh. 15 - Prob. 1SPACh. 15 - Prob. 2SPACh. 15 - Prob. 3SPACh. 15 - Prob. 4SPACh. 15 - Prob. 5SPACh. 15 - Prob. 6SPACh. 15 - Prob. 7SPACh. 15 - Prob. 8SPACh. 15 - Prob. 9APACh. 15 - Prob. 10APACh. 15 - Prob. 11APACh. 15 - Prob. 12APACh. 15 - Prob. 13APACh. 15 - Prob. 14APACh. 15 - Prob. 15APACh. 15 - Prob. 16APACh. 15 - Prob. 17APACh. 15 - Prob. 18APACh. 15 - Prob. 19APACh. 15 - Prob. 20APACh. 15 - Prob. 21APACh. 15 - Prob. 22APACh. 15 - Prob. 23APA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Sam and Sarah are thinking about getting married. However if either of them cheats on the other, they would get a payoff of 10, while the other person gets zero. If neither cheat, they stay with each other and get a payoff of 7 each and if both cheat, the relationship falls apart and each get a payoff of 1. What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? a. Cheat, Cheat b. Not cheat, Not cheat Sam cheats, Sarah doesn't Sarah cheats, Sam doesn'tarrow_forwardCould you put this game tree into game matrix form and find the nash equilibrium please. I will up votearrow_forwardTucker and Eddie are playing the following game. Tucker can choose A or B and Eddie can choose C or D. The first payoff is for Tucker, the second for Eddie. Eddie Tucker C D A 3, 2 4, 3 B 4, 5 3, 4 Identify the Nash equilibrium(s) in this game. What rational game theoretic advice would you offer Tucker and Eddie on how to play this game? If Tucker and Eddie follow your advice, what payoff should each expect? Show your work.arrow_forward
- This is game theory questionarrow_forwardUse the following extensive-form game to answer the following questions. a. List the feasible strategies for player 1 and player 2. b. Identify the Nash equilibria to this game. c. Find the subgame perfect equilibrium.arrow_forwardThis is game theory question/ Quantity Competition and Nash Equilibrium. There are two pictures below. One has the question and the other one includes the answer. I need step by step solution to how they came up with numbers shown in the solution. Thank youarrow_forward
- In game theory, what are some conflicts (history/fiction) in which there is a nash equilibrium between 2 actors?arrow_forwardConsider the group of games called the Prisoners' Dilemma games. Which of the following is not true about the games? Each player has a unique best response There is a Nash Equilibrium where both players randomize over their options O Each player cgyld do better if the Nash Equilibrium was not the outcome All of the other answers are correct Either player would be made better off if their opponent was to unilaterally deviate from a Nash Equilibriumarrow_forwardes What are the necessary features of a prisoner's dilemma-type game? Check All That Apply Two prisoners must be locked in separate jail cells. There must be a unique Nash equilibrium. The Nash equilibrium outcome must be inefficient. The game must have exactly three players. The game must have a dominant strategy.arrow_forward
- Game Theory I am trying to assign numbers (theoretical)to a game im making. Its about Tipping. Its based on 3 different efforts a server has showed Can you assign numbers to each of these. This is all made up so you can use whatever values they just need to be in regard to the other values. Thanks. I was thinking to start on high effort Tip could be +10 and no tip could be -10 Best and worst scenario. You do high effort service and get tipped and high effort with no tip. Thanksarrow_forwardConsider the following game where two players have to decide if they want to buy a movie ticket or a baseball ticket. They have the highest payoffs when they both buy tickets to the same activity, but must decide simultaneously what to buy without knowing what the other person will do. a. Does either player have a dominant strategy? b. How many equilibria does this game have? c. Is this an example of a prisoner’s dilemma? Explain. d. What will be the outcome if your friend buys their ticket first and you can observe their choice?arrow_forwardSolve for the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) in each of the following games. (a) The following two-by-two game is a little harder to solve since firm 2’spreferred strategy depends of what firm 1 does. But firm 1 has a dominantstrategy so this game has one Nash equilibrium. Firm 2 Launch Don’tFirm 1 Launch 60, -10 100, 0 Don’t 80, 30 120, 0 What is the Nash equilibrium of this simultaneous-move game? (b) What would the outcome of this game be if instead firm 1 moved first and then, after seeing what firm 1 chose, firm 2 chose it strategy? In this case firm 1 doesn’t necessarily need to choose a best response, but firm 2 must choose a best response since it moves second.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781285165875Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971493Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Principles of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781285165875
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305971493
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781305156050
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning