a)
Explanation of Solution
Kant’s categorical imperative:
The Kant’s categorical imperative is desired by the philosopher “Immanuel Kant” and he defined as that an “imperative” is a something that a person have to do.
For example, suppose a person wants to stop for being a thirsty then he has to drink, so in that ways we can says it is an “imperative”. And this will also know as the categorical /direct imperative.
- Kant’s categorical imperative states that one should behave in such a way that one would want the behavior to be a universal law.
- Cheating the customers is not ethical behavior, which is if all the company tries to deceive their customer then there won’t exists any honesty.
- Convincing their customers by making communication of real people with the bots is unethical. People are not aware that only bots were used to interact with them.
Therefore, according to Kant’s categorical imperative it is unethical to use bots to communicate with the customers.
b)
Explanation of Solution
Utilitarianism perspective:
Utilitarianism is nothing but a moral theory that states that the greatest act is the one that increases utility.
- According to utilitarian perspective, using bots on dating site is not ethical as it brings benefits only to the company.
- Customers are harmed financially, because they pay for the service provided by the company.
- The company is trying to cheat the customers by using automated bots instead of real people.
- They also demolish the time of people who spent in chatting with the bots.
Therefore, according to utilitarian perspective, it is unethical to use bots to communicate with the customers.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
Experiencing MIS
- A security breach of personal information has resulted in some identity theft over the past three years. What can you do to protect yourself against identity fraud? Give a specific exampl A security breach of personal information has resulted in some identity theft over the past three years. What can you do to protect yourself against identity fraud? Give a specific example of what you mean. e of what you mean.arrow_forwardConsider three ethical principles of your choice. What is the best justification of these principles? Consider some reasonable alternative justification of these principles. Why is your justification better? (Remember, if you think your justification is the best, then you must have some reason for thinking so!)arrow_forwardoung, technically oriented hackers argued that, if the owners of a computer system want to keep outsiders out, it is their responsibility to provide better security. Ken Thompson, one of the inventors of UNIX, said, "The act of breaking into a computer system has to have the same social stigma as breaking into a neighbor’s house. It should not matter that the neighbor’s door is unlocked." Which position do you agree with more? Give your reasonsarrow_forward
- Can you please help me find an applicable law/s for these three commandments, the specific violation identified, and a Remark (including specific penalties). Below is an example. The law/s should be from the Philippines Here is the table I should fill out: Computer Ethics commandment Applicable Laws Specific Violation Identified Remark 4. Thou shalt not use a computer to steal. 5. Thou shalt not use a computer to bear false witness 6. Thou shalt not copy or use proprietary software for which you have not paid (without permission).arrow_forwardUse an online search engine to locate a peer-reviewed journal article with at least 100 citations that examines the hazards of working inside vs outside of an organisation. Is there a change in either type or an explanation for the shift in the paper's subject matter? In your opinion, which of the two categories is more difficult to avoid and why?arrow_forwardThere is quite a number of approaches to the study of ethical issues. With clear illustrations, compare two of such approaches.arrow_forward
- Question 4 a) A class assignment has been given to all students learning NT182. The lecturer decides to award zero to students who have copied each other's solution. Discuss why you consider the lecturer's decision ethical or unethical. b) Discuss the harmful effects computers and electronic devices on users and suggest possible solutions.arrow_forwardDiscuss the benefits, drawbacks, concerns, and ethics of hacktivism. Questions which could be examined include: Is it an effective political tool? Is it an ethical one? How can hacktivism be weaponized? What are the ethical conflicts involved and how do you weigh them? What are the legal ramifications? Should those ramifications be enforced? Are there times where hacktivism has gone too far (even if you personally agree with the cause)?arrow_forwardAnalyze the following scenario: An employee using company resources sends email that is later retrieved when the employee sues the company. Is there a reasonable expectation of privacy? Is it different if the computer used was purchased by the employee but the email was sent during work hours? What additional facts or changes in your assumptions would alter your analysis? Ethically, what are the arguments, pro and con, for an employer monitoring electronic communication?arrow_forward
- For each point, I need to write one paragraph ( I need the paragraph to be general and doesn’t go in details about the cyber aspects ) 1- what is cyber safety 2- How to protect yourself online 3- What will the future of cyber safetyarrow_forwardIs there any instance that you disobeyed the right of privacy of others (your family members, classmates, friends, etc.) If so, in what situation or reason. Explain.arrow_forward4. Do you think it was ethical for authorities to use one of the high-ranking members to trap other gang members? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- Fundamentals of Information SystemsComputer ScienceISBN:9781337097536Author:Ralph Stair, George ReynoldsPublisher:Cengage Learning