To discuss: The constitutional law’s fundamental principles.
Explanation of Solution
The constitutional law’s fundamental principles are as follows:
Pre-emption and federal supremacy: It means the federal government’s right to control the matters inside it authorities to the prospective elimination of the regulation of the state.
Federalism: The authority to rule is shared among the state and federal government. Any authority particularly given to the federal government are set aside to the persons and states.
Powers separation: The distribution of authority between the legislative, judicial and executive government branches to stop any government branch from attaining more authority. It allows operation of each branch without inference from any other branch.
Judicial review: It is the process of analysing actions of government to conclude whether they follow to the constitution of country U.
Action of state: State action means the actions of state, central and their subdivisions like country or city governments as disparate to the movements of secluded persons.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 4 Solutions
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
- Explain the social, political, and ethical implications of the law and their application to actual and hypothetical business transactions.arrow_forwardTitle : The Importance of Constitutionalism in Public Institutions. Explain in your writing The Concept of Constitutionalism with reflect to the current Malaysian Legal Systemarrow_forwardDistinguish the concept of ethics from law.arrow_forward
- Discuss why the legal system in the United States ensures that federal law preempts state law. What are the advantages of having one set of laws, such as federal law, above all others? Does this infringe upon the states' rights to govern their citizens? Even if the federal constitution should preempt all other laws, should federal statutes preempt state constitutions? Why/why not?arrow_forwardBUSINESS LAW 3 - David Ungar holds a Dunkin’ Donut's franchise. The terms of his franchise agreement require him to use only those ingredients furnished by Dunkin’ Donuts. He is also required to buy its napkins, cups, and so on, with the Dunkin’ Donut's trademark on them. Is this an illegal tying arrangement? What if Dunkin’ Donuts maintains that it needs these requirements to maintain its quality levels on a nationwide basis? [Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts of America, Inc., 429 U.S 5 - Hines Cosmetic Co. sold beauty preparations nationally to beauty shops at a standard or fixed- price schedule. Some of the shops were also supplied with a free demonstrator and free advertising materials. The shops that were not supplied with them claimed that giving the free services and materials constituted unlawful price discrimination. Hines replied that there was no price discrimination because it charged everyone the same. What it was giving free was merely a promotional campaign that was not…arrow_forwardNature of law crime and criminal lawarrow_forward
- Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationManagement (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSONSpreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSONBusiness Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSONFundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON