The correction to the ground state energy of hydrogen due to the finite size of the nucleus.
Answer to Problem 7.33P
The correction to the ground state energy of hydrogen due to the finite size of the nucleus is
Explanation of Solution
Using perturbation theory,
And the energy correction is
The wave function of the ground state is
Where
Solving equation (II),
Solving further,
Let
Therefore, the above equation becomes,
Solving the above equation,
Since, the ground state energy of the hydrogen is
Where
Therefore,
Keeping only the leading term,
Substitute
The energy correction for the fine structure is
Therefore, the estimated correction to the ground state energy of hydrogen due to the finite size of the nucleus is very small compared to the fine structure and the hyperfine structure.
Conclusion:
Thus, the correction to the ground state energy of hydrogen due to the finite size of the nucleus is
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 7 Solutions
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
- Given: R is the midpoint of QS, ZRPQ =ZRTS prove: APQR = ATSR P.arrow_forwardIn free spoce, E (2,t) = 10. sin (wt - 82) ox, (V/m) %3D Show that the overage power po ssing through circular disk with a radius of 15.5 m in the Constant plane z= is IW. (Please write down , explaining all the Steps)arrow_forwardAnswers must be expressed in engineering notation (when the exponent of the base ten multiplier is not a multiple of 3, press ENG or SHIFT+ENG, whichever the case.) Example: 0.06N or 6.0x10-2 N must be expressed to 60x10-³N or 60mN 1. Consider a beam of electrons that moves from the electron gun towards the screen of a cathode ray tube due to the potential difference of 15kV. A pair of coils are placed outside a cathode ray tube and produce a uniform magnetic field of 250 µT across the tube. Calculate the force experienced by the electrons if the magnetic field is in place: a. parallel with the direction of the beam. b. Perpendicular with the direction of the beam. c. 50 degrees with the direction of the beam.arrow_forward
- Problem 1: Estimate the probability that a hydrogen atom at room temperature is in one of its first excited states (relative to the probability of being in the ground state). Don't forget to take degeneracy into account. Then repeat the calculation for a hydrogen atom in the atmosphere of the star y UMa, whose surface temperature is approximately 9500K.arrow_forwardFind an equation for the plane through the points (-6, 8, – 1) and (-1,3, –8) and perpendicular to the plane -4x – 3y + 8z = 10. An equation for the plane is ...arrow_forwardWhat are the values of the following integrals relevant to the description of a hydrogen- like atom. In each case provide the work that justifies your answer. (If an answer is written without work or explanation it won't be counted). (a) ( W43,–1,} | V4,4,–1,- ). (b) (v,3,–1,} | Ħ |W43,-1. ). (c) (¼43,-1, | J: |44,3,-1, )- | J: | W43,–1,} )- 4,3,–1, (d) ( V4,3,–1,} | Sz |W4,-3,1 -3,-1. ).arrow_forward
- PROBLEM 3. Using the variational method, calculate the ground state en- ergy Eo of a particle in the triangular potential: U(r) = 0 r 0. Use the trial function v(x) = Cx exp(-ar), where a is a variational parameter and C is a normalization constant to be found. Compare your result for Eo with the exact solution, Eo 1.856(h? F/m)/3.arrow_forwardConvert points P(1,3,5), T(0, -4, 3), and S(-3,-4,-10) from Cartesian to cylindrical and spherical coordinates.arrow_forwardSketch the potential energy function of an electron in a hydrogen atom, (a) What is the value of this function at r=0 ? in the limit that r=? (b) What is unreasonable or inconsistent with the former result?arrow_forward
- Problem 3: Chemical potential of an Einstein solid. Consider an Einstein solid for which both N and q are much greater than 1. Think of each ocillator as a separate “particle". a) Show that the chemical potential is H = -kT In (**e) b) Discuss this result in the limits N » q and N « q, concentrating on the question of how much S increases when another particle carrying no energy is added to the system. Does the formula make intuitive sense?arrow_forwardhere R jl and nl is a function of x or k ??? i m confusd advance physics questionnarrow_forwardThe flux of F out of a small sphere of radius 0.05 centered at (4, 3, 4), is 0.015. Estimate: (a) div F at (4, 3, 4): div F 2 (b) The flux of F out of a sphere of radius 0.1 centered at (4, 3, 4). flux 2arrow_forward
- University Physics Volume 3PhysicsISBN:9781938168185Author:William Moebs, Jeff SannyPublisher:OpenStax