Practical Operations Management
Practical Operations Management
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9781939297136
Author: Simpson
Publisher: HERCHER PUBLISHING,INCORPORATED
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 9, Problem 24P

a.

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:

The company that has the lowest bid and the total cost of that bid.

Concept Introduction:

Under linear averaging method score of each tender will be result of sum of individual score in each category multiplied by corresponding category weight.

a.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Given information:

A tender invitation for a consulting project was sent and four companies have done the bidding as below-

    Junior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by junior consultants (hr)Senior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by senior consultants (hr)
    Company A301015010
    Company B35152506
    Company C40203002
    Company D40202004

Based on the bid provided four companies, total cost for all consulting hours is calculated as below-

    Junior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by junior consultants (hr)Senior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by senior consultants (hr)Total bid cost($)
    Company A301015010(30×10+150×10)=1800
    Company B35152506(35×15+250×6)=2025
    Company C40203002(40×20+300×2)=1400
    Company D40202004(40×20+200×4)=1600

Thus it is clear that the lowest bid is from company C and the bid amount is $1400 .

b.

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:

The company that will take the fewest hours to complete the work and the hours is may take.

Concept Introduction:

Under linear averaging method score of each tender will be result of sum of individual score in each category multiplied by corresponding category weight.

b.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Given information:

A tender invitation for a consulting project was sent and four companies have done the bidding as below-

    Junior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by junior consultants (hr)Senior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by senior consultants (hr)
    Company A301015010
    Company B35152506
    Company C40203002
    Company D40202004

Based on the bid provided four companies, total consulting hours is calculated as below-

    Junior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by junior consultants (hr)Senior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by senior consultants (hr)Total consulting hours
    Company A30101501010+10=20
    Company B3515250615+6=21
    Company C4020300220+2=22
    Company D4020200420+4=24

Thus it is clear that the company A will take least time of 20 hours to complete the work.

c.

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:

Price score and quality score of the bid based on stated specification.

Concept Introduction:

Under linear averaging method score of each tender will be result of sum of individual score in each category multiplied by corresponding category weight.

c.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Given information:

A tender invitation for a consulting project was sent and four companies have done the bidding as below-

    Junior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by junior consultants (hr)Senior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by senior consultants (hr)
    Company A301015010
    Company B35152506
    Company C40203002
    Company D40202004

For calculation of price score, each company is awarded 100 points initially and then penalized 1 point for every $25 their price exceeds the lowest bid.

For calculation of quality score, the proportion of hours provided by senior consultant is multiplied by 100 (rounded to the nearest integer).

Based on the bid provided four companies, total cost for all consulting hours is calculated as below-

    Junior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by junior consultants (hr)Senior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by senior consultants (hr)Total bid cost($)
    Company A301015010(30×10+150×10)=1800
    Company B35152506(35×15+250×6)=2025
    Company C40203002(40×20+300×2)=1400
    Company D40202004(40×20+200×4)=1600

Thus it is clear that the lowest bid is from company C and the bid amount is $1400 .

For calculation of price score, each company is awarded 100 points initially and then penalized 1 point for every $25 their price exceeds the lowest bid. The price score is calculated as below-

    Total bid cost($)Difference with lowest bid($)Penalty for price score Price score
    Company A180040040025=16(10016)=84
    Company B202562562525=25(10025)=75
    Company C140000100
    Company D160020020025=8(1008)=92

For calculation of quality score, the proportion of hours provided by senior consultant is multiplied by 100 (rounded to the nearest integer).

    Hours provided by junior consultants (hr)Hours provided by senior consultants (hr)Proportion of hours provided by senior consultantQuality score
    Company A10101010=11×100=100
    Company B156615=0.40.4×100=40
    Company C202220=0.10.1×100=10
    Company D204420=0.20.2×100=20

Hence company B has worst price score of 75 and company C has worst quality score of 10 .

d.

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:

The company that would win the bid based 70% weightage of price and 30% weightage of quality.

Concept Introduction:

Under linear averaging method score of each tender will be result of sum of individual score in each category multiplied by corresponding category weight.

d.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Given information:

A tender invitation for a consulting project was sent and four companies have done the bidding as below-

    Junior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by junior consultants (hr)Senior consultant hourly rate ($)Hours provided by senior consultants (hr)
    Company A301015010
    Company B35152506
    Company C40203002
    Company D40202004

For calculation of price score, each company is awarded 100 points initially and then penalized 1 point for every $25 their price exceeds the lowest bid.

For calculation of quality score, the proportion of hours provided by senior consultant is multiplied by 100 (rounded to the nearest integer).

For finalizing the contract 70% weightage is given to price score and 30% weightage is given to quality score. Based on the bid provided four companies and method used for calculation of price score and quality, below table is calculated:

    Price scoreQuality scoreWeighted average score
    Company A84100(84×0.70+100×0.30)=88.8
    Company B7540(75×0.70+40×0.30)=64.5
    Company C10010(100×0.70+10×0.30)=73
    Company D9220(92×0.70+20×0.30)=70.4

Hence, company A has highest weighted average score and should be awarded with the contract.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
What are the factors that affect Options contracts? Which is the most and least significant of the factors?
What's the difference between a standard commercial contract and an outsourcing contract? Which of the two is more important? Why? What elements should you take into account while forming a vendor selection team and its charter? Which of the eight steps in the vendor identification and selection process is the most important? Why? Justify your answer. The key areas of concern in recognizing and managing BPO expenses are the financial and strategic costs. Which is the more essential of the two? Justify your answer. What was the importance of the BPO industry during the COVID Pandemic of 2020?
You are appointed by the government as part of the committee to evaluate the tender submitted for renovation work in University Malaya. Explain in brief FOUR (4) the importance of supporting documents during the tender evaluation process.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781259667473
Author:William J Stevenson
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Text book image
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi...
Operations Management
ISBN:9781259666100
Author:F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Text book image
Business in Action
Operations Management
ISBN:9780135198100
Author:BOVEE
Publisher:PEARSON CO
Text book image
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi...
Operations Management
ISBN:9781478623069
Author:Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:Waveland Press, Inc.