A Critical Review of Knowledge Management as a Management Tool

Hislop, D. (2013). Knowledge management in organizations: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

This chapter reviews the related literature on knowledge management. It is divided into five main sections. The first section presents conceptual framework for the study elucidating key concepts of the study. The second section discusses the theoretical framework where key theories informing the study are discussed. In this section knowledge management theories and models are discussed and linked to the study. Section three reviews a critical review of the existing literature on the subject of knowledge management. In this section empirical studies are interrogated and critiqued to identify important variables which are relevant in this study. The current international knowledge coordination systems and knowledge management best practices will be evaluated. The literature review ends with a discussion of knowledge management critical success factors (knowledge enablers) related to the objectives of this study. The need for top management commitment in knowledge management processes is examined. The effect of organizational

The superior capabilities of knowledge management systems provide an opportunity for the business to engage the most effective components and recognize the importance of communication to make informed, accurate decisions (McGrath, 2001). This system can organize the company’s knowledge resources, knowledge obtaining, organizing, and applying to make a sound routine the will enforce effectiveness (Niu, 2008). The dynamic function of knowledge management to create, capture, and apply knowledge to achieve an organization’s objective will allow them to be more profitable and successful (Zucker, 1986). In addition to increasing profits, the system can be also used to reduce costs and enhance research and development (DeTienne & Jackson, 2001). With all of these advantages, it would be wasteful for a company to not employ knowledge management. As seen in the Discovery Communications, Inc. example, the company can attribute their new productivity levels and increase in ease of securing documents to the knowledge management system that put into place by Carefree Technology. Like Discovery Communications, Inc., knowledge management is so popular today because companies can collect, process and share knowledge to ignite employees ' creativity which in turn will make the business grow. Wenhong and Jianhua (2009) explained the core of knowledge management is to convert company’s knowledge resources into an increased company

While Knowledge Management (KM) is important in any business however, there is no real agreed upon definition. KM is a concept that includes the

With the benefit of hindsight, it is apparent that in the knowledge era, creating and leveraging knowledge is the business of business. By all available measures, the stock market is already providing handsome rewards to companies that successfully leverage their knowledge--a phenomenon that will almost surely grow in significance as knowledge-based organizations increase in size and number. A number of firms are anticipating this and looking to knowledge management to enhance, measure, and manage the knowledge of their employees and organizations more effectively.

A report has been written describing the knowledge management systems and reviewed based on various aspects which was used to determine whether or not the system considered could be used for managing knowledge. It was through researching journals, articles and other reliable sources from the internet this review was written which led to me finding out more on the topic of knowledge management which has considerably increased my understanding of the topic

Knowledge management often involves isolating and planning intellectual assets within an organization, producing new knowledge for competitive advantages within the organization, making vast amounts of corporate information accessible. Knowledge management can be hard to interpret or explain. How would a nurse or doctor define “health care” succinctly? How would a CEO explain “management”? Each of these areas is very complex, with many sub-areas of specialization. This in turn leads to the question “What is Knowledge Management Strategy & Metrics”?

Despite the recent lack of agreement on what is meant by knowledge management, the definitions of knowledge management aim at three core components of knowledge management: knowledge/information repositories, communities and networks and experts and knowers. (Chatti & Jarke & Frosch-Wilke, 2007, page 406)

It has been argued that within the short space of time between defining knowledge management and it becoming a common phrase, many organisations stated one of their main aims as ‘leveraging organisational knowledge’ (Ruggles, 1998). It is with this in mind that organisations must be aware of their knowledge workers, the information they hold and any potential knowledge based changes that may need to be implemented to help their success, or even, survival.

Knowledge management can be very essential to people in leadership positions that is required to make executive decisions on behalf of a company or organization. However, it is necessary for individuals holding such position to have a thorough understanding of the knowledge management process. Therefore, this paper discusses the best practices for creating and implementing a knowledge management project and discuss measurements, metrics and potential resources for data exists and how each are incorporated into the design of a system.

Like many emerging business processes rooted in technology, knowledge management is defined somewhat differently by different organizations, and by different individuals within those organizations. Some organizations see knowledge management as

At the present time, organizations do not compete merely on the grounds of financial resources and tangible assets, rather knowledge is the new competitive advantage in business. According to Omotayo (2015), there is popular saying that knowledge is power. depending on this claim, it can be said that knowledge management is the key to power.

Where there is knowledge, there is a need to manage it. To disseminate this knowledge, there is a new term “Knowledge Management (KM)”.

Knowledge Management (KM) is a strategic method of locating, defining, collecting, storing, sharing, organising, receiving and adopting valuable information and knowledge within an

In this Era of Technology, many organizations mostly make use of two knowledge management strategies, they are explained below: